Myocardial Stiffness Evaluation Using Noninvasive Shear Wave Imaging in Healthy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathic Adults.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic
/ diagnostic imaging
Case-Control Studies
Diastole
Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Female
Heart Failure
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardium
/ pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Stroke Volume
Ventricular Function, Left
Young Adult
diastolic function
echocardiography
myocardial stiffness
myocardium
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1876-7591
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
26
11
2017
revised:
31
01
2018
accepted:
01
02
2018
pubmed:
20
3
2018
medline:
18
3
2020
entrez:
19
3
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The goal of our study was to investigate the potential of myocardial shear wave imaging (SWI) to quantify the diastolic myocardial stiffness (MS) (kPa) noninvasively in adult healthy volunteers (HVs) and its physiological variation with age, and in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) populations with heart failure and preserved ejection function (HFpEF). MS is an important prognostic and diagnostic parameter of the diastolic function. MS is affected by physiological changes but also by pathological alterations of extracellular and cellular tissues. However, the clinical assessment of MS and the diastolic function remains challenging. SWI is a novel ultrasound-based technique that has the potential to provide intrinsic MS noninvasively. We prospectively included 80 adults: 60 HV (divided into 3 groups: 20- to 39-year old patients [n = 20]; 40- to 59-year-old patients [n = 20]; and 60- to 79-year-old patients [n = 20]) and 20 HCM-HFpEF patients. Echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and biological explorations were achieved. MS evaluation was performed using an ultrafast ultrasound scanner with cardiac phased array. The fractional anisotropy of MS was also estimated. MS increased significantly with age in the HV group (the mean MS was 2.59 ± 0.58 kPa, 4.70 ± 0.88 kPa, and 6.08 ± 1.06 kPa for the 20- to 40-year-old, 40- to 60-year-old, and 60- to 80-year-old patient groups, respectively; p < 0.01 between each group). MS was significantly higher in HCM-HFpEF patients than in HV patients (mean MS = 12.68 ± 2.91 kPa vs. 4.47 ± 1.68 kPa, respectively; p < 0.01), with a cut-off at 8 kPa (area under the curve = 0.993; sensitivity = 95%, specificity = 100%). The fractional anisotropy was lower in HCM-HFpEF (mean = 0.133 ± 0.073) than in HV (0.238 ± 0.068) (p < 0.01). Positive correlations were found between MS and diastolic parameters in echocardiography (early diastolic peak/early diastolic mitral annular velocity, r = 0.783; early diastolic peak/transmitral flow propagation velocity, r = 0.616; left atrial volume index, r = 0.623) and with fibrosis markers in cardiac magnetic resonance (late gadolinium enhancement, r = 0.804; myocardial T1 pre-contrast, r = 0.711). MS was found to increase with age in healthy adults and was significantly higher in HCM-HFpEF patients. Myocardial SWI has the potential to become a clinical tool for the diagnostic of diastolic dysfunction. (Non-invasive Evaluation of Myocardial Stiffness by Elastography [Elasto-Cardio]; NCT02537041).
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
The goal of our study was to investigate the potential of myocardial shear wave imaging (SWI) to quantify the diastolic myocardial stiffness (MS) (kPa) noninvasively in adult healthy volunteers (HVs) and its physiological variation with age, and in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) populations with heart failure and preserved ejection function (HFpEF).
BACKGROUND
MS is an important prognostic and diagnostic parameter of the diastolic function. MS is affected by physiological changes but also by pathological alterations of extracellular and cellular tissues. However, the clinical assessment of MS and the diastolic function remains challenging. SWI is a novel ultrasound-based technique that has the potential to provide intrinsic MS noninvasively.
METHODS
We prospectively included 80 adults: 60 HV (divided into 3 groups: 20- to 39-year old patients [n = 20]; 40- to 59-year-old patients [n = 20]; and 60- to 79-year-old patients [n = 20]) and 20 HCM-HFpEF patients. Echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and biological explorations were achieved. MS evaluation was performed using an ultrafast ultrasound scanner with cardiac phased array. The fractional anisotropy of MS was also estimated.
RESULTS
MS increased significantly with age in the HV group (the mean MS was 2.59 ± 0.58 kPa, 4.70 ± 0.88 kPa, and 6.08 ± 1.06 kPa for the 20- to 40-year-old, 40- to 60-year-old, and 60- to 80-year-old patient groups, respectively; p < 0.01 between each group). MS was significantly higher in HCM-HFpEF patients than in HV patients (mean MS = 12.68 ± 2.91 kPa vs. 4.47 ± 1.68 kPa, respectively; p < 0.01), with a cut-off at 8 kPa (area under the curve = 0.993; sensitivity = 95%, specificity = 100%). The fractional anisotropy was lower in HCM-HFpEF (mean = 0.133 ± 0.073) than in HV (0.238 ± 0.068) (p < 0.01). Positive correlations were found between MS and diastolic parameters in echocardiography (early diastolic peak/early diastolic mitral annular velocity, r = 0.783; early diastolic peak/transmitral flow propagation velocity, r = 0.616; left atrial volume index, r = 0.623) and with fibrosis markers in cardiac magnetic resonance (late gadolinium enhancement, r = 0.804; myocardial T1 pre-contrast, r = 0.711).
CONCLUSIONS
MS was found to increase with age in healthy adults and was significantly higher in HCM-HFpEF patients. Myocardial SWI has the potential to become a clinical tool for the diagnostic of diastolic dysfunction. (Non-invasive Evaluation of Myocardial Stiffness by Elastography [Elasto-Cardio]; NCT02537041).
Identifiants
pubmed: 29550319
pii: S1936-878X(18)30140-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.002
pmc: PMC6603249
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02537041']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1135-1145Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;8(9):1071-1093
pubmed: 26381769
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 19;67(15):1815-1825
pubmed: 27081022
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Oct 08;15:91
pubmed: 24103764
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 May;17(6):1343-51
pubmed: 2016452
Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):673-7
pubmed: 22523322
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Dec;17(12):1321-1360
pubmed: 27422899
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Jul;291(1):H403-12
pubmed: 16428349
Circ Res. 1974 Jul;35(1):117-26
pubmed: 4841253
Hepatology. 2010 Feb;51(2):454-62
pubmed: 20101745
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Nov;287(5):H2132-7
pubmed: 15231502
Circulation. 2002 Mar 19;105(11):1387-93
pubmed: 11901053
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):1031-41
pubmed: 25896355
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Feb 15;302(4):H885-92
pubmed: 22180656
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1953-9
pubmed: 15128895
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004 Apr;51(4):396-409
pubmed: 15139541
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4;52(19):1574-80
pubmed: 19007595
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jun;25(6):661-6
pubmed: 22465872
Circulation. 2015 Apr 7;131(14):1247-59
pubmed: 25637629
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Jul;35(7):1419-27
pubmed: 27208201
Circulation. 2002 Feb 5;105(5):595-601
pubmed: 11827925
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
Echocardiography. 2017 Jan;34(1):6-13
pubmed: 27779335
Circ Res. 2004 Jun 25;94(12):1533-42
pubmed: 15217918
J Physiol. 2012 Apr 15;590(8):1871-80
pubmed: 22331419
Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):1004-12
pubmed: 16424239
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Aug 21;57(16):5075-95
pubmed: 22836727
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jun 16;43(12):2260-4
pubmed: 15193690
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 28;58(1):65-72
pubmed: 21700091
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 May;11(5):779-781
pubmed: 29153574
Cardiovasc Res. 1993 Mar;27(3):341-8
pubmed: 8490934
Circulation. 2008 Apr 22;117(16):2051-60
pubmed: 18413502
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 14;35(39):2733-79
pubmed: 25173338