Dentin sealing and antibacterial effects of silver-doped bioactive glass/mesoporous silica nanocomposite: an in vitro study.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ chemical synthesis
Bicuspid
Ceramics
/ chemistry
Citric Acid
Dentin
/ drug effects
Dentin Desensitizing Agents
/ chemical synthesis
Dentin Permeability
/ drug effects
Dentin Sensitivity
/ drug therapy
Drug Combinations
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Materials Testing
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Nanocomposites
Porosity
Silicon Dioxide
/ chemistry
Silver
/ chemistry
Spectrophotometry, Atomic
Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
Tensile Strength
X-Ray Diffraction
Antibacterial effect
Bioactive glass
Dentin hypersensitivity
Mesoporous silica
Nanoparticle
Remineralization
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
13
07
2017
accepted:
19
03
2018
pubmed:
7
4
2018
medline:
7
6
2019
entrez:
7
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To synthesize a silver-doped bioactive glass/mesoporous silica nanoparticle (Ag-BGN@MSN), as well as to investigate its effects on dentinal tubule occlusion, microtensile bond strength (MTBS), and antibacterial activity. Ag-BGN@MSN was synthesized using a modified "quick alkali-mediated sol-gel" method. Demineralized tooth disc models were made and divided into four groups; the following treatments were then applied: group 1-no treatment, group 2-bioglass, group 3-MSN, group 4-Ag-BGN@MSN. Next, four discs were selected from each group and soaked into 6 wt% citric acid to test acid-resistant stability. Dentinal tubule occlusion, as well as the occlusion ratio, was observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy. The MTBS was also measured to evaluate the desensitizing effect of the treatments. Cytotoxicity was examined using the MTT assay. Antibacterial activity was detected against Lactobacillus casei, and ion dissolution was evaluated using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Ag-BGN@MSN effectively occluded the dentinal tubule and formed a membrane-like layer. After the acid challenge, Ag-BGN@MSN had the highest rate of dentinal tubule occlusion. There were no significant differences in MTBS among the four groups (P > 0.05). All concentrations of Ag-BGN@MSN used had a relative cell viability above 72%. Ag-BGN@MSN was successfully fabricated using a modified sol-gel method. The Ag-BGN@MSN biocomposite effectively occluded dentinal with acid-resistant stability, did not decrease bond strength in self-etch adhesive system, had low cytotoxicity, and antibacterial effect. Dentinal tubule sealing induced by Ag-BGN@MSN biocomposite with antibacterial effect is likely to increase long-term stability in DH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29623418
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2432-z
pii: 10.1007/s00784-018-2432-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Bioglass
0
Dentin Desensitizing Agents
0
Drug Combinations
0
Citric Acid
2968PHW8QP
Silver
3M4G523W1G
Silicon Dioxide
7631-86-9
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
253-266Subventions
Organisme : the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP)
ID : NRF-2015R1C1A1A01051832
Références
Biomaterials. 2000 Sep;21(17):1803-10
pubmed: 10905463
J Dent. 2003 Sep;31(7):453-61
pubmed: 12927456
J Am Dent Assoc. 1963 Mar;66:366-70
pubmed: 14014982
J Dent. 1992 Oct;20(5):272-6
pubmed: 1452864
Dent Mater. 2005 Jun;21(6):511-9
pubmed: 15904693
J Dent. 2007 Jan;35(1):21-7
pubmed: 16713669
Acta Biomater. 2007 Nov;3(6):936-43
pubmed: 17560183
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;74(7):2171-8
pubmed: 18245232
Acta Biomater. 2008 May;4(3):707-16
pubmed: 18248860
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Aug;19(8):2933-40
pubmed: 18360795
Dent Mater. 2008 Dec;24(12):1608-15
pubmed: 18490049
J Dent. 2008 Dec;36(12):1005-12
pubmed: 18818008
J Dent. 2008 Dec;36(12):1013-24
pubmed: 18922613
Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e11-6
pubmed: 20018362
J Dent. 2010 May;38(5):400-10
pubmed: 20097250
J Dent Res. 2010 Mar;89(3):236-40
pubmed: 20110512
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):218-24
pubmed: 21217949
Biomaterials. 2011 Apr;32(11):2757-74
pubmed: 21292319
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1014-20
pubmed: 22007662
Adv Mater. 2012 Mar 22;24(12):1504-34
pubmed: 22378538
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Nov;39(11):812-20
pubmed: 22882603
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S55-9
pubmed: 23274415
Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Jun;121(3 Pt 1):204-10
pubmed: 23659244
Am J Dent. 2013 Jun;26(3):137-42
pubmed: 23986960
Dent Mater J. 2014;33(1):125-32
pubmed: 24492123
Nanomedicine. 2015 Feb;11(2):313-27
pubmed: 25461284
Acta Biomater. 2015 Feb;13:1-15
pubmed: 25462853
Gen Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;64(1):67-73
pubmed: 26742171
J Dent. 2016 Jul;50:21-9
pubmed: 27101767
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 May-Aug;3(2):69-77
pubmed: 27507915
Braz Dent J. 2017 Mar-Apr;28(2):216-224
pubmed: 28492753
J Clin Periodontol. 1987 May;14(5):280-4
pubmed: 3475295
J Dent. 1985 Sep;13(3):230-6
pubmed: 3862690
Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39 Suppl:73S-80S
pubmed: 7702470
J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Nov;24(11):808-13
pubmed: 9402502
J Endod. 1998 Jan;24(1):45-7
pubmed: 9487867