Modified Blumgart Mattress Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Suture in Pancreaticojejunostomy During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
27
4
2018
medline:
15
11
2019
entrez:
27
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether mattress suture of pancreatic parenchyma and the seromuscular layer of jejunum (modified Blumgart method) during pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) decreases the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Several studies reported that mattress suture of Blumgart anastomosis in PJ could reduce POPF rate. This, however, is the first RCT. Between June, 2013 and May, 2017, 224 patients scheduled for PD were enrolled in this study in Wakayama Medical University Hospital. Enrolled patients were randomized to either interrupted suture or modified Blumgart mattress suture. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade B/C POPF based on the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula criteria. This RCT was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01898780). Patients were randomized to either interrupted suture (103 patients) or modified Blumgart mattress suture (107 patients) and were analyzed by intention-to-treat. Grade B/C POPF occurred in 7 patients (6.8%) in the interrupted suture group and 11 (10.3%) in the mattress suture group (P = 0.367). Mortality within 90 days was 0 in both groups. There were no significant differences in all postoperative complications between the interrupted suture group and the modified Blumgart mattress suture group. Mattress suture of pancreatic parenchyma and the jejunal seromuscular layer during PJ (modified Blumgart technique) did not reduce clinically relevant POPF compared with interrupted suture.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
This study used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether mattress suture of pancreatic parenchyma and the seromuscular layer of jejunum (modified Blumgart method) during pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) decreases the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
BACKGROUND
Several studies reported that mattress suture of Blumgart anastomosis in PJ could reduce POPF rate. This, however, is the first RCT.
METHODS
Between June, 2013 and May, 2017, 224 patients scheduled for PD were enrolled in this study in Wakayama Medical University Hospital. Enrolled patients were randomized to either interrupted suture or modified Blumgart mattress suture. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade B/C POPF based on the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula criteria. This RCT was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01898780).
RESULTS
Patients were randomized to either interrupted suture (103 patients) or modified Blumgart mattress suture (107 patients) and were analyzed by intention-to-treat. Grade B/C POPF occurred in 7 patients (6.8%) in the interrupted suture group and 11 (10.3%) in the mattress suture group (P = 0.367). Mortality within 90 days was 0 in both groups. There were no significant differences in all postoperative complications between the interrupted suture group and the modified Blumgart mattress suture group.
CONCLUSIONS
Mattress suture of pancreatic parenchyma and the jejunal seromuscular layer during PJ (modified Blumgart technique) did not reduce clinically relevant POPF compared with interrupted suture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29697455
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002802
pmc: PMC6325750
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01898780']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
243-251Références
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591
pubmed: 28040257
Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):316-20
pubmed: 16495694
Surg Clin North Am. 1956 Jun;36(3):707-24
pubmed: 13324659
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Apr;399(4):461-71
pubmed: 24663295
Ann Surg. 1995 Oct;222(4):580-8; discussion 588-92
pubmed: 7574936
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):773-80
pubmed: 24253151
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):605-12
pubmed: 24374513
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):655-62
pubmed: 23643139
World J Surg. 2005 Jan;29(1):76-9
pubmed: 15592915
Br J Surg. 2012 Apr;99(4):524-31
pubmed: 22497024
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jun;18(6):1108-15
pubmed: 24733259
Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):246-53
pubmed: 17667503
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jan;210(1):54-9
pubmed: 20123332
JAMA Surg. 2014 Feb;149(2):203-7
pubmed: 24369374
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2014-22
pubmed: 25894407
Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):761-8
pubmed: 17981197
Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):1-7
pubmed: 16794381
Surg Today. 1996;26(7):532-5
pubmed: 8840437
Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):495-501
pubmed: 21248633
Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt A):1-6
pubmed: 25682724
Br J Surg. 2013 Nov;100(12):1597-605
pubmed: 24264781
Br J Surg. 2009 Jul;96(7):741-50
pubmed: 19526614
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):10-8
pubmed: 26577499
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1084-91
pubmed: 24975853
Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):440-9
pubmed: 26135690
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1368-75
pubmed: 19797283
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):20-5
pubmed: 17629996
Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):529-37
pubmed: 22868373
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):767-71, discussion 771-3
pubmed: 16327486
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):207-14
pubmed: 20622661
Am J Surg. 2010 Jun;199(6):759-64
pubmed: 20074698
Br J Surg. 2016 May;103(6):668-675
pubmed: 27040594
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):139-45
pubmed: 22609844
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):77-87
pubmed: 29047069
Am J Surg. 2005 Jun;189(6):720-9
pubmed: 15910726
Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):930-8
pubmed: 19092337
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Sep;16(9):1686-95
pubmed: 22744638