Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials.


Journal

Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 02 08 2017
accepted: 25 04 2018
pubmed: 18 5 2018
medline: 1 8 2019
entrez: 18 5 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the surface roughness of CAD/CAM materials immediately after milling and after different chairside and labside polishing procedures. A two-body wear test was performed to compare the different wear characteristics of the materials and the corresponding antagonists. Specimens (n = 12 per series) from different CAD/CAM materials (three composites: Lava Ultimate, Cerasmart, BRILLIANT Crios; one hybrid ceramic: VITA Enamic; three ceramics: Celtra Duo, VITA Suprinity, IPS Emax.CAD) were polished according to the manufacturer's instructions. The effect of different polishing procedures was investigated by comparing surface roughness (R After chairside high-gloss polishing, ceramics and composites exhibited R Chairside polishing is as effective as labside polishing, although surfaces were directly adjusted (roughened) only before the chairside polishing. Wear was lowest for ceramics, followed by the resin-infiltrated material and the resin composites. Polishing after milling or adjustment is essential to guaranteeing optimal clinical performance. Chairside polishing after adjustment leads to comparably smooth surfaces as labside polishing after milling and grinding. Ceramics are expected to exhibit lower wear than resin composites under clinical conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29770877
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2473-3
pii: 10.1007/s00784-018-2473-3
doi:

Substances chimiques

Composite Resins 0
Dental Materials 0
IPS e.max CAD LT 0
VITA Enamic 0
VITA Suprinity 0
Dental Porcelain 12001-21-7

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

725-737

Références

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Jun;10:13-22
pubmed: 22520415
J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137 Suppl:22S-31S
pubmed: 16950934
Dent Mater. 2016 Nov;32(11):e275-e283
pubmed: 27639808
Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69
pubmed: 11696906
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Nov 12;29(6):450-458
pubmed: 28891600
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Apr;103(4):221-7
pubmed: 20362765
Dent Mater. 2017 Jan;33(1):99-109
pubmed: 27884403
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1213-1219
pubmed: 27370027
Dent Mater. 2006 Aug;22(8):712-34
pubmed: 16574212
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1141-50
pubmed: 24980740
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Oct;74:251-260
pubmed: 28645068
Dent Mater. 2016 Jan;32(1):34-42
pubmed: 26454798
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:218-31
pubmed: 17594384
Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;51(2):379-97, ix
pubmed: 17532918
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):510-6
pubmed: 23138735
Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):529-34
pubmed: 22230107
Dent Mater. 2017 Jan;33(1):84-98
pubmed: 27890354
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(4):495-502
pubmed: 26235715
Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):470-81
pubmed: 20672733
Dent Mater. 2000 Nov;16(6):381-8
pubmed: 10967186
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Mar;115(3):350-5
pubmed: 26553254
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul;71(3-4):820-7
pubmed: 23638859
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Nov;98(5):389-404
pubmed: 18021828
Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):176-82
pubmed: 16039706
Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):101-110
pubmed: 27802120
J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Dec 5;42(3):465-72
pubmed: 9788511
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Dec;116(6):585-92
pubmed: 19049531
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;28(1):56-66
pubmed: 26176202
J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137 Suppl:5S-6S
pubmed: 16950931
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e172-e180
pubmed: 28273681
Gen Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;61(1):e4-8
pubmed: 23302371
Dent Mater. 2017 Mar;33(3):294-308
pubmed: 28089394
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015 Jan;103(1):143-50
pubmed: 24799187
Int J Comput Dent. 2001 Jul;4(3):171-84
pubmed: 11862884
Dent Mater. 2008 Apr;24(4):433-49
pubmed: 17720238
Dent Mater. 1992 Sep;8(5):305-9
pubmed: 1303372
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):199-202
pubmed: 26460171
Dent Mater. 2002 Dec;18(8):590-5
pubmed: 12385900
Dent Mater. 2009 Mar;25(3):296-301
pubmed: 18804855

Auteurs

Mike Matzinger (M)

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. mike.matzinger@gmx.de.

Sebastian Hahnel (S)

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.

Verena Preis (V)

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.

Martin Rosentritt (M)

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

Hemiarthroplasty in young patients.

Hazimah Mahmud, Dong Wang, Andra Topan-Rat et al.
1.00
Humans Male Hemiarthroplasty Middle Aged Aged
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
1.00
Sudan Archaeology Humans History, Ancient Animals
Biomass Lignin Wood Populus Microscopy, Electron, Scanning

Classifications MeSH