Opportunity to discuss ethical issues during clinical learning experience.


Journal

Nursing ethics
ISSN: 1477-0989
Titre abrégé: Nurs Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9433357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 23 5 2018
medline: 29 8 2020
entrez: 23 5 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Undergraduate nursing students have been documented to experience ethical distress during their clinical training and felt poorly supported in discussing the ethical issues they encountered. This study was aimed at exploring nursing students' perceived opportunity to discuss ethical issues that emerged during their clinical learning experience and associated factors. An Italian national cross-sectional study design was performed in 2015-2016. Participants were invited to answer a questionnaire composed of four sections regarding: (1) socio-demographic data, (2) previous clinical learning experiences, (3) current clinical learning experience quality and outcomes, and (4) the opportunity to discuss ethical issues with nurses in the last clinical learning experience (from 0 - 'never' to 3 - 'very much'). Participants were 9607 undergraduate nursing students who were attending 95 different three-year Italian baccalaureate nursing programmes, located at 27 universities in 15 Italian regions. This study was conducted in accordance with the Human Subject Research Ethics Committee guidelines after the research protocol was approved by an ethics committee. Overall, 4707 (49%) perceived to have discussed ethical issues 'much' or 'very much'; among the remaining, 3683 (38.3%) and 1217 (12.7%) students reported the perception of having discussed, respectively, 'enough' or 'never' ethical issues emerged in the clinical practice. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis explaining 38.1% of the overall variance, the factors promoting ethical discussion were mainly set at the clinical learning environment levels (i.e. increased learning opportunities, self-directed learning, safety and nursing care quality, quality of the tutorial strategies, competences learned and supervision by a clinical nurse). In contrast, being male was associated with a perception of less opportunity to discuss ethical issues. Nursing faculties should assess the clinical environment prerequisites of the settings as a context of student experience before deciding on their accreditation. Moreover, the nursing faculty and nurse managers should also enhance competence with regard to discussing ethical issues with students among clinical nurses by identifying factors that hinder this learning opportunity in daily practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Undergraduate nursing students have been documented to experience ethical distress during their clinical training and felt poorly supported in discussing the ethical issues they encountered.
RESEARCH AIMS OBJECTIVE
This study was aimed at exploring nursing students' perceived opportunity to discuss ethical issues that emerged during their clinical learning experience and associated factors.
RESEARCH DESIGN METHODS
An Italian national cross-sectional study design was performed in 2015-2016. Participants were invited to answer a questionnaire composed of four sections regarding: (1) socio-demographic data, (2) previous clinical learning experiences, (3) current clinical learning experience quality and outcomes, and (4) the opportunity to discuss ethical issues with nurses in the last clinical learning experience (from 0 - 'never' to 3 - 'very much').
PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT METHODS
Participants were 9607 undergraduate nursing students who were attending 95 different three-year Italian baccalaureate nursing programmes, located at 27 universities in 15 Italian regions.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS METHODS
This study was conducted in accordance with the Human Subject Research Ethics Committee guidelines after the research protocol was approved by an ethics committee.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Overall, 4707 (49%) perceived to have discussed ethical issues 'much' or 'very much'; among the remaining, 3683 (38.3%) and 1217 (12.7%) students reported the perception of having discussed, respectively, 'enough' or 'never' ethical issues emerged in the clinical practice. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis explaining 38.1% of the overall variance, the factors promoting ethical discussion were mainly set at the clinical learning environment levels (i.e. increased learning opportunities, self-directed learning, safety and nursing care quality, quality of the tutorial strategies, competences learned and supervision by a clinical nurse). In contrast, being male was associated with a perception of less opportunity to discuss ethical issues.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Nursing faculties should assess the clinical environment prerequisites of the settings as a context of student experience before deciding on their accreditation. Moreover, the nursing faculty and nurse managers should also enhance competence with regard to discussing ethical issues with students among clinical nurses by identifying factors that hinder this learning opportunity in daily practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29783904
doi: 10.1177/0969733018774617
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1665-1679

Auteurs

Alvisa Palese (A)

University of Udine, Italy.

Silvia Gonella (S)

University of Torino, Italy.

Anne Destrebecq (A)

University of Milano, Italy.

Irene Mansutti (I)

University of Udine, Italy.

Stefano Terzoni (S)

University of Milano, Italy.

Michela Morsanutto (M)

University of Udine, Italy.

Pietro Altini (P)

University of Turin, Italy.

Anita Bevilacqua (A)

University of Verona, Italy.

Anna Brugnolli (A)

University of Verona, Italy.

Federica Canzan (F)

University of Verona, Italy.

Adriana Dal Ponte (AD)

University of Verona, Italy.

Laura De Biasio (L)

University of Trieste, Italy.

Adriana Fascì (A)

University of Trieste, Italy.

Silvia Grosso (S)

University of Padova, Italy.

Franco Mantovan (F)

University of Verona, Italy.

Oliva Marognolli (O)

University of Verona, Italy.

Raffaela Nicotera (R)

University of Torino, Italy.

Giulia Randon (G)

University of Verona, Italy.

Morena Tollini (M)

University of Verona, Italy.

Luisa Saiani (L)

University of Verona, Italy.

Luca Grassetti (L)

University of Udine, Italy.

Valerio Dimonte (V)

University of Turin, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH