International consensus on a complications list after gastrectomy for cancer.
Clavien–Dindo classification
Comprehensive Complications Index
Gastrectomy
Gastric cancer
International consensus
Perioperative complications
Journal
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
ISSN: 1436-3305
Titre abrégé: Gastric Cancer
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 100886238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2018
accepted:
19
05
2018
pubmed:
31
5
2018
medline:
16
4
2019
entrez:
31
5
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Perioperative complications can affect outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer, with high mortality and morbidity rates ranging between 10 and 40%. The absence of a standardized system for recording complications generates wide variation in evaluating their impacts on outcomes and hinders proposals of quality-improvement projects. The aim of this study was to provide a list of defined gastrectomy complications approved through international consensus. The Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group consists of 34 European gastric cancer experts who are members of the International Gastric Cancer Association. A group meeting established the work plan for study implementation through Delphi surveys. A consensus was reached regarding a set of standardized methods to define gastrectomy complications. A standardized list of 27 defined complications (grouped into 3 intraoperative, 14 postoperative general, and 10 postoperative surgical complications) was created to provide a simple but accurate template for recording individual gastrectomy complications. A consensus was reached for both the list of complications that should be considered major adverse events after gastrectomy for cancer and their specific definitions. The study group also agreed that an assessment of each surgical case should be completed at patient discharge and 90 days postoperatively using a Complication Recording Sheet. The list of defined complications (soon to be validated in an international multicenter study) and the ongoing development of an electronic datasheet app to record them provide the basic infrastructure to reach the ultimate goals of standardized international data collection, establishment of benchmark results, and fostering of quality-improvement projects.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Perioperative complications can affect outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer, with high mortality and morbidity rates ranging between 10 and 40%. The absence of a standardized system for recording complications generates wide variation in evaluating their impacts on outcomes and hinders proposals of quality-improvement projects. The aim of this study was to provide a list of defined gastrectomy complications approved through international consensus.
METHODS
The Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group consists of 34 European gastric cancer experts who are members of the International Gastric Cancer Association. A group meeting established the work plan for study implementation through Delphi surveys. A consensus was reached regarding a set of standardized methods to define gastrectomy complications.
RESULTS
A standardized list of 27 defined complications (grouped into 3 intraoperative, 14 postoperative general, and 10 postoperative surgical complications) was created to provide a simple but accurate template for recording individual gastrectomy complications. A consensus was reached for both the list of complications that should be considered major adverse events after gastrectomy for cancer and their specific definitions. The study group also agreed that an assessment of each surgical case should be completed at patient discharge and 90 days postoperatively using a Complication Recording Sheet.
CONCLUSION
The list of defined complications (soon to be validated in an international multicenter study) and the ongoing development of an electronic datasheet app to record them provide the basic infrastructure to reach the ultimate goals of standardized international data collection, establishment of benchmark results, and fostering of quality-improvement projects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29846827
doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0839-5
pii: 10.1007/s10120-018-0839-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
172-189Références
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194
pubmed: 11532239
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2767-73
pubmed: 15199090
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Surgery. 1992 May;111(5):518-26
pubmed: 1598671
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):11-20
pubmed: 16822992
Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):477-90
pubmed: 19625077
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96
pubmed: 19638912
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 May;36(5):439-46
pubmed: 20392590
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90
pubmed: 21296855
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 May;214(5):798-805
pubmed: 22421260
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):421-33
pubmed: 23297025
Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7
pubmed: 23728278
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21(6):2005-11
pubmed: 24526547
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):3008-14
pubmed: 24700300
Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):286-94
pubmed: 25607756
Med Oncol. 2015 Apr;32(4):120
pubmed: 25788033
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jan;19(1):15-20
pubmed: 26140915
Surg Today. 2016 Jun;46(6):668-85
pubmed: 26289837
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;42(1):116-22
pubmed: 26461256
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):20-30
pubmed: 27255288
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):823-830
pubmed: 27429033
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4322
pubmed: 27442682
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591
pubmed: 28040257
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):121-124
pubmed: 28226341
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):135-139
pubmed: 28226344
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):700-710
pubmed: 28288055
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1045-1050
pubmed: 28486288
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):285-288
pubmed: 28710718
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):831-838
pubmed: 28742708
Trials. 2017 Aug 9;18(1):370
pubmed: 28793921
Lancet. 1996 Apr 13;347(9007):995-9
pubmed: 8606613