Texture analysis on diffusion tensor imaging: discriminating glioblastoma from single brain metastasis.
Adult
Aged
Brain Edema
/ diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Diagnosis, Differential
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
/ methods
Female
Glioblastoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
/ diagnostic imaging
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Glioblastoma
brain metastases
diffusion tensor imaging
magnetic resonance imaging
peritumoral edema
texture analysis
Journal
Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)
ISSN: 1600-0455
Titre abrégé: Acta Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
5
6
2018
medline:
27
2
2019
entrez:
5
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Texture analysis has been done on several radiological modalities to stage, differentiate, and predict prognosis in many oncologic tumors. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of discriminating glioblastoma (GBM) from single brain metastasis (MET) by assessing the heterogeneity of both the solid tumor and the peritumoral edema with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis (MRTA). Preoperative MRI examinations done on a 3-T scanner of 43 patients were included: 22 GBM and 21 MET. MRTA was performed on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in a representative region of interest (ROI). The MRTA was assessed using a commercially available research software program (TexRAD) which applies a filtration histogram technique for characterizing tumor and peritumoral heterogeneity. The filtration step selectively filters and extracts texture features at different anatomical scales varying from 2 mm (fine) to 6 mm (coarse). Heterogeneity quantification was obtained by the statistical parameter entropy. A threshold value to differentiate GBM from MET with sensitivity and specificity was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Quantifying the heterogeneity of the solid part of the tumor showed no significant difference between GBM and MET. However, the heterogeneity of the GBMs peritumoral edema was significantly higher than the edema surrounding MET, differentiating them with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 90%. Assessing the peritumoral heterogeneity can increase the radiological diagnostic accuracy when discriminating GBM and MET. This will facilitate the medical staging and optimize the planning for surgical resection of the tumor and postoperative management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Texture analysis has been done on several radiological modalities to stage, differentiate, and predict prognosis in many oncologic tumors.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of discriminating glioblastoma (GBM) from single brain metastasis (MET) by assessing the heterogeneity of both the solid tumor and the peritumoral edema with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis (MRTA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
Preoperative MRI examinations done on a 3-T scanner of 43 patients were included: 22 GBM and 21 MET. MRTA was performed on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in a representative region of interest (ROI). The MRTA was assessed using a commercially available research software program (TexRAD) which applies a filtration histogram technique for characterizing tumor and peritumoral heterogeneity. The filtration step selectively filters and extracts texture features at different anatomical scales varying from 2 mm (fine) to 6 mm (coarse). Heterogeneity quantification was obtained by the statistical parameter entropy. A threshold value to differentiate GBM from MET with sensitivity and specificity was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Quantifying the heterogeneity of the solid part of the tumor showed no significant difference between GBM and MET. However, the heterogeneity of the GBMs peritumoral edema was significantly higher than the edema surrounding MET, differentiating them with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 90%.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Assessing the peritumoral heterogeneity can increase the radiological diagnostic accuracy when discriminating GBM and MET. This will facilitate the medical staging and optimize the planning for surgical resection of the tumor and postoperative management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29860889
doi: 10.1177/0284185118780889
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM