Dimensional analysis of depressive, anxious and somatic symptoms presented by primary care patients and their relationship with ICD-11 PHC proposed diagnoses.
Adult
Anxiety
/ psychology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression
/ psychology
Humans
International Classification of Diseases
Internationality
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Mental Disorders
/ diagnosis
Primary Health Care
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Reproducibility of Results
Anxiety
ICD-11
bi-factor model
depression
primary care
somatization
Journal
Psychological medicine
ISSN: 1469-8978
Titre abrégé: Psychol Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1254142
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
5
6
2018
medline:
15
5
2020
entrez:
5
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A study conducted as part of the development of the Eleventh International Classification of Mental Disorders for Primary Health Care (ICD-11 PHC) provided an opportunity to test the relationships among depressive, anxious and somatic symptoms in PHC. Primary care physicians participating in the ICD-11 PHC field studies in five countries selected patients who presented with somatic symptoms not explained by known physical pathology by applying a 29-item screening on somatic complaints that were under study for bodily stress disorder. Patients were interviewed using the Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised and assessed using two five-item scales that measure depressive and anxious symptoms. Structural models of anxious-depressive symptoms and somatic complaints were tested using a bi-factor approach. A total of 797 patients completed the study procedures. Two bi-factor models fit the data well: Model 1 had all symptoms loaded on a general factor, along with one of three specific depression, anxiety and somatic factors [x2 (627) = 741.016, p < 0.0011, RMSEA = 0.015, CFI = 0.911, TLI = 0.9]. Model 2 had a general factor and two specific anxious depression and somatic factors [x2 (627) = 663.065, p = 0.1543, RMSEA = 0.008, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.948]. These data along with those of previous studies suggest that depressive, anxious and somatic symptoms are largely different presentations of a common latent phenomenon. This study provides support for the ICD-11 PHC conceptualization of mood disturbance, especially anxious depression, as central among patients who present multiple somatic symptoms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A study conducted as part of the development of the Eleventh International Classification of Mental Disorders for Primary Health Care (ICD-11 PHC) provided an opportunity to test the relationships among depressive, anxious and somatic symptoms in PHC.
METHOD
Primary care physicians participating in the ICD-11 PHC field studies in five countries selected patients who presented with somatic symptoms not explained by known physical pathology by applying a 29-item screening on somatic complaints that were under study for bodily stress disorder. Patients were interviewed using the Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised and assessed using two five-item scales that measure depressive and anxious symptoms. Structural models of anxious-depressive symptoms and somatic complaints were tested using a bi-factor approach.
RESULTS
A total of 797 patients completed the study procedures. Two bi-factor models fit the data well: Model 1 had all symptoms loaded on a general factor, along with one of three specific depression, anxiety and somatic factors [x2 (627) = 741.016, p < 0.0011, RMSEA = 0.015, CFI = 0.911, TLI = 0.9]. Model 2 had a general factor and two specific anxious depression and somatic factors [x2 (627) = 663.065, p = 0.1543, RMSEA = 0.008, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.948].
CONCLUSIONS
These data along with those of previous studies suggest that depressive, anxious and somatic symptoms are largely different presentations of a common latent phenomenon. This study provides support for the ICD-11 PHC conceptualization of mood disturbance, especially anxious depression, as central among patients who present multiple somatic symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29860958
pii: S0033291718001381
doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001381
pmc: PMC6425363
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
764-771Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Références
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Sep;67(3):189-97
pubmed: 19686874
CNS Spectr. 2008 May;13(5):379-84
pubmed: 18496475
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012 Nov-Dec;34(6):665-70
pubmed: 22832134
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(3):223-37
pubmed: 26514921
J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 15;213:199-206
pubmed: 28278448
Psychol Med. 2005 Jul;35(7):1073-82
pubmed: 16045073
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;25(1):65-76
pubmed: 23383668
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Dec;91:48-54
pubmed: 27894462
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 May-Jun;30(3):191-9
pubmed: 18433651
Psychosom Med. 2007 Dec;69(9):860-3
pubmed: 18040095
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Sep 1;47(5):667-696
pubmed: 24049214
Psychol Med. 2012 Jan;42(1):15-28
pubmed: 21682948
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Jan;126(1):137-148
pubmed: 27748619
Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):137-50
pubmed: 26523435
Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;2(2):119-137
pubmed: 25360393
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59
pubmed: 20954056
Fam Pract. 2013 Feb;30(1):76-87
pubmed: 22843638
Psychosomatics. 2007 Jul-Aug;48(4):277-85
pubmed: 17600162
Psychol Med. 1992 May;22(2):465-86
pubmed: 1615114
Int Psychiatry. 2011 Feb 01;8(1):1-3
pubmed: 31508060
Fam Pract. 2017 Sep 1;34(5):574-580
pubmed: 28475675
Psychosom Med. 2007 Jan;69(1):30-9
pubmed: 17244846
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;5(2):126-34
pubmed: 17389536
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2007 Dec;30(4):593-619
pubmed: 17938036
Braz J Psychiatry. 2011 May;33 Suppl 1:S59-80
pubmed: 21845336