Concomitant CIS on TURBT does not impact oncological outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy.


Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 30 03 2018
accepted: 28 05 2018
pubmed: 9 6 2018
medline: 8 6 2019
entrez: 9 6 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle invasive bladder cancer improves all-cause and cancer specific survival. We aimed to evaluate whether the detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS) at the time of initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) has an oncological impact on the response to NAC prior to radical cystectomy. Patients were identified retrospectively from 19 centers who received at least three cycles of NAC or induction chemotherapy for cT2-T4aN0-3M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder followed by radical cystectomy between 2000 and 2013. The primary and secondary outcomes were pathological response and overall survival, respectively. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the independent predictive value of CIS on these outcomes. Of 1213 patients included in the analysis, 21.8% had concomitant CIS. Baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics of the 'CIS' versus 'no-CIS' groups were similar. The pathological response did not differ between the two arms when response was defined as pT0N0 (17.9% with CIS vs 21.9% without CIS; p = 0.16) which may indicate that patients with CIS may be less sensitive to NAC or ≤ pT1N0 (42.8% with CIS vs 37.8% without CIS; p = 0.15). On Cox regression model for overall survival for the cN0 cohort, the presence of CIS was not associated with survival (HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.63-1.18; p = 0.35). The presence of LVI (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96; p = 0.04), hydronephrosis (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.23-2.16; p = 0.001) and use of chemotherapy other than ddMVAC (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.94; p = 0.03) were associated with shorter overall survival. For the whole cohort, the presence of CIS was also not associated with survival (HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.82-1.35; p = 0.70). In this multicenter, real-world cohort, CIS status at TURBT did not affect pathologic response to neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy. This study is limited by its retrospective nature as well as variability in chemotherapy regimens and surveillance regimens.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle invasive bladder cancer improves all-cause and cancer specific survival. We aimed to evaluate whether the detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS) at the time of initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) has an oncological impact on the response to NAC prior to radical cystectomy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
Patients were identified retrospectively from 19 centers who received at least three cycles of NAC or induction chemotherapy for cT2-T4aN0-3M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder followed by radical cystectomy between 2000 and 2013. The primary and secondary outcomes were pathological response and overall survival, respectively. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the independent predictive value of CIS on these outcomes.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 1213 patients included in the analysis, 21.8% had concomitant CIS. Baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics of the 'CIS' versus 'no-CIS' groups were similar. The pathological response did not differ between the two arms when response was defined as pT0N0 (17.9% with CIS vs 21.9% without CIS; p = 0.16) which may indicate that patients with CIS may be less sensitive to NAC or ≤ pT1N0 (42.8% with CIS vs 37.8% without CIS; p = 0.15). On Cox regression model for overall survival for the cN0 cohort, the presence of CIS was not associated with survival (HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.63-1.18; p = 0.35). The presence of LVI (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96; p = 0.04), hydronephrosis (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.23-2.16; p = 0.001) and use of chemotherapy other than ddMVAC (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.94; p = 0.03) were associated with shorter overall survival. For the whole cohort, the presence of CIS was also not associated with survival (HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.82-1.35; p = 0.70).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In this multicenter, real-world cohort, CIS status at TURBT did not affect pathologic response to neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy. This study is limited by its retrospective nature as well as variability in chemotherapy regimens and surveillance regimens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29882105
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2361-0
pii: 10.1007/s00345-018-2361-0
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
Cisplatin Q20Q21Q62J

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

165-172

Références

Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):720-724
pubmed: 28753837
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):886-93
pubmed: 26521718
J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2632-7
pubmed: 19836794
Cancer Cell. 2004 Aug;6(2):111-6
pubmed: 15324694
Int J Urol. 2012 Mar;19(3):229-33
pubmed: 22121922
Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36(1):41-4
pubmed: 15338671
Urol Oncol. 2018 Sep;36(9):413-422
pubmed: 29128420
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):241-9
pubmed: 25257030
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Aug;15(4):479-486
pubmed: 28040424
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;2(8):1094-6
pubmed: 27310333
Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov;32(8):1108-15
pubmed: 25443274
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):74-80
pubmed: 20546806
Cancer Cell. 2014 Feb 10;25(2):152-65
pubmed: 24525232
J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1494-9
pubmed: 25451834
Cancer. 2009 Feb 15;115(4):792-9
pubmed: 19127557
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):354-365
pubmed: 28365159
Cancer Discov. 2014 Oct;4(10):1140-53
pubmed: 25096233
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):959-67
pubmed: 26238431
Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jan;15(1):25-41
pubmed: 25533674
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):859-66
pubmed: 12944571

Auteurs

N Vasdev (N)

Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK. nikhil.vasdev@nhs.net.
School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. nikhil.vasdev@nhs.net.
Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. nikhil.vasdev@nhs.net.

H Zargar (H)

Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

J P Noël (JP)

Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK.
School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

R Veeratterapillay (R)

Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

A S Fairey (AS)

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

L S Mertens (LS)

Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

C P Dinney (CP)

Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

M C Mir (MC)

Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

L M Krabbe (LM)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

M S Cookson (MS)

Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

N E Jacobsen (NE)

University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

N M Gandhi (NM)

Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

J Griffin (J)

Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

J S Montgomery (JS)

Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

E Y Yu (EY)

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

E Xylinas (E)

Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

N J Campain (NJ)

Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.

W Kassouf (W)

(Division of Urology) Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.

M A Dall'Era (MA)

Department of Urology, Davis Medical Center, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

J A Seah (JA)

Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.

C E Ercole (CE)

Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

S Horenblas (S)

Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

S S Sridhar (SS)

Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.

J S McGrath (JS)

Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.

J Aning (J)

Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK.

S F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

J L Wright (JL)

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

T M Morgan (TM)

Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

T J Bivalacqua (TJ)

Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

S North (S)

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

D A Barocas (DA)

Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Y Lotan (Y)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

P Grivas (P)

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

A J Stephenson (AJ)

Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

J B Shah (JB)

Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

B W van Rhijn (BW)

Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

S Daneshmand (S)

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

P E Spiess (PE)

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

J M Holzbeierlein (JM)

Department of Urology, Medical Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

A Thorpe (A)

Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

P C Black (PC)

Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH