Is chocolate consumption associated with health outcomes? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.


Journal

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-1983
Titre abrégé: Clin Nutr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8309603

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 02 04 2018
revised: 21 05 2018
accepted: 23 05 2018
pubmed: 16 6 2018
medline: 29 5 2020
entrez: 16 6 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The literature regarding the potential health benefits of chocolate consumption are unclear and the epidemiological credibility has not been systematically scrutinized, while the strength of the evidence is undetermined. We therefore aimed to map and grade the diverse health outcomes associated with chocolate consumption using an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Umbrella review of systematic reviews of observational and intervention studies (randomized placebo-controlled trials, RCTs). For each association, random-effects summary effect size, 95% confidence interval, and 95% prediction interval were estimated. We also assessed heterogeneity, evidence for small-study effect and evidence for excess significance bias. For significant outcomes of the RCTs, the GRADE assessment was furtherly used. From 240 articles returned, 10 systematic reviews were included (8 of which included a meta-analysis), including a total of 84 studies (36 prospective observational studies and 48 interventional). Nineteen different outcomes were included. Among observational studies, including a total of 1,061,637 participants, the best available evidence suggests that chocolate consumption is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) death (n = 4 studies), acute myocardial infarction (n = 6), stroke (n = 5) and diabetes (n = 6), although this was based on a weak evidence of credibility. Across meta-analyses of intervention studies, chocolate consumption was positively associated with flow-mediated dilatation at 90-150 min (n = 3) and at 2-18 weeks (n = 3), and insulin resistance markers (n = 2). However, using the GRADE assessment, the evidence for these outcomes was low or very low. Data from two systematic reviews, reported that chocolate consumption was not associated with better depressive mood or cognitive function. There is weak evidence to suggest that chocolate consumption may be associated with favorable health outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
The literature regarding the potential health benefits of chocolate consumption are unclear and the epidemiological credibility has not been systematically scrutinized, while the strength of the evidence is undetermined. We therefore aimed to map and grade the diverse health outcomes associated with chocolate consumption using an umbrella review of systematic reviews.
METHODS
Umbrella review of systematic reviews of observational and intervention studies (randomized placebo-controlled trials, RCTs). For each association, random-effects summary effect size, 95% confidence interval, and 95% prediction interval were estimated. We also assessed heterogeneity, evidence for small-study effect and evidence for excess significance bias. For significant outcomes of the RCTs, the GRADE assessment was furtherly used.
RESULTS
From 240 articles returned, 10 systematic reviews were included (8 of which included a meta-analysis), including a total of 84 studies (36 prospective observational studies and 48 interventional). Nineteen different outcomes were included. Among observational studies, including a total of 1,061,637 participants, the best available evidence suggests that chocolate consumption is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) death (n = 4 studies), acute myocardial infarction (n = 6), stroke (n = 5) and diabetes (n = 6), although this was based on a weak evidence of credibility. Across meta-analyses of intervention studies, chocolate consumption was positively associated with flow-mediated dilatation at 90-150 min (n = 3) and at 2-18 weeks (n = 3), and insulin resistance markers (n = 2). However, using the GRADE assessment, the evidence for these outcomes was low or very low. Data from two systematic reviews, reported that chocolate consumption was not associated with better depressive mood or cognitive function.
CONCLUSIONS
There is weak evidence to suggest that chocolate consumption may be associated with favorable health outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29903472
pii: S0261-5614(18)30204-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.019
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1101-1108

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : ICA-CL-2017-03-001
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nicola Veronese (N)

National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Aging Branch, Padova, Italy; Ambulatory of Nutrition, IRCCS "S. de Bellis" National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy. Electronic address: ilmannato@gmail.com.

Jacopo Demurtas (J)

Primary Care Department, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Grosseto, Italy.

Stefano Celotto (S)

Primary Care Department, Aziendale AAS3 Alto Friuli - Collina - Medio Friuli, Udine, Italy.

Maria Gabriella Caruso (MG)

Ambulatory of Nutrition, IRCCS "S. de Bellis" National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy.

Stefania Maggi (S)

National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Aging Branch, Padova, Italy.

Francesco Bolzetta (F)

Medical Department, Geriatric Unit, Azienda ULSS (Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria) 3 "Serenissima", Dolo-Mirano District, Italy.

Joseph Firth (J)

NICM, School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Australia; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK.

Lee Smith (L)

The Cambridge Centre for Sport & Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

Patricia Schofield (P)

Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.

Ai Koyanagi (A)

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu/CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Lin Yang (L)

Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Marco Solmi (M)

University of Padova, Department of Neuroscience, Padova, Italy.

Brendon Stubbs (B)

Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK; Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ, UK; Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH