Invasive EEG-electrodes in presurgical evaluation of epilepsies: Systematic analysis of implantation-, video-EEG-monitoring- and explantation-related complications, and review of literature.
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Drug Resistant Epilepsy
/ diagnostic imaging
Electrodes, Implanted
/ adverse effects
Electroencephalography
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnostic imaging
Preoperative Care
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Seizures
/ diagnostic imaging
Stereotaxic Techniques
/ adverse effects
Subdural Space
/ diagnostic imaging
Video-Assisted Surgery
/ adverse effects
Young Adult
Complications
EEG
Epilepsy
Epilepsy surgery
Refractory epilepsy
sEEG
Journal
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
ISSN: 1525-5069
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
22
03
2018
revised:
04
05
2018
accepted:
05
05
2018
pubmed:
17
6
2018
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
17
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is a diagnostic procedure for patients with refractory focal epilepsies that is performed to localize and define the epileptogenic zone. In contrast to grid electrodes, sEEG electrodes are implanted using minimal invasive operation techniques without large craniotomies. Previous studies provided good evidence that sEEG implantation is a safe and effective procedure; however, complications in asymptomatic patients after explantation may be underreported. The aim of this analysis was to systematically analyze clinical and imaging data following implantation and explantation. We analyzed 18 consecutive patients (mean age: 30.5 years, range: 12-46; 61% female) undergoing invasive presurgical video-EEG monitoring via sEEG electrodes (n = 167 implanted electrodes) over a period of 2.5 years with robot-assisted implantation. There were no neurological deficits reported after implantation or explantation in any of the enrolled patients. Postimplantation imaging showed a minimal subclinical subarachnoid hemorrhage in one patient and further workup revealed a previously unknown factor VII deficiency. No injuries or status epilepticus occurred during video-EEG monitoring. In one patient, a seizure-related asymptomatic cross break of two fixation screws was found and led to revision surgery. Unspecific symptoms like headaches or low-grade fever were present in 10 of 18 (56%) patients during the first days of video-EEG monitoring and were transient. Postexplantation imaging showed asymptomatic and small bleedings close to four electrodes (2.8%). Overall, sEEG is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. Systematic imaging after implantation and explantation helps to identify clinically silent complications of sEEG. In the literature, complication rates of up to 4.4% in sEEG and in 49.9% of subdural EEG are reported; however, systematic imaging after explantation was not performed throughout the studies, which may have led to underreporting of associated complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29907526
pii: S1525-5050(18)30253-1
doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.05.012
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
30-37Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.