Three-dimensional indices of renal perfusion in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
3D ultrasound
Pre-eclampsia
Renal perfusion
Journal
Irish journal of medical science
ISSN: 1863-4362
Titre abrégé: Ir J Med Sci
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7806864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
06
04
2017
accepted:
08
06
2018
pubmed:
20
6
2018
medline:
26
3
2019
entrez:
20
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We compared renal perfusion in normal pregnant women and women with pre-eclampsia using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. We measured the flow index (FI), vascular index (VI) and vascularisation flow index (VFI) which are believed to reflect vascularity and flow intensity. Fourteen patients with normal pregnancy and 16 patients with pre-eclampsia were recruited. Imaging was conducted using a Voluson E8 machine and a 6-MHz trans-abdominal probe. The inferior border of the maternal left kidney was scanned. Volumes were acquired using 3D power Doppler angiography (3D-PDA). The FI, VI and VFI were generated using 'histogram' facility. Maternal characteristics between normal pregnant women and women with pre-eclampsia were not different in terms of maternal age, gestation or body mass index. Depth of insonnation was not different between groups. The FI, VI and the VFI were not different between groups. The mean (SD) for FI was 27.9 (7.4) vs. 27.1 (6.5) between women with normal pregnancy vs. women with pre-eclampsia. For VI, mean (SD) was 72.3(31.6) vs. 79.4 (28.7) respectively. For VFI, mean (SD) was 20.8 (10.8) vs. 20.8 (8.1) respectively. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, no statistical differences between groups were apparent. There was no correlation between FI measurements and maternal creatinine (Pearson's R square = 0.04; p = 0.45) or with maternal urea levels (Pearson's R square = 0.20; p = 0.10). Using 3D ultrasound, we failed to demonstrate a difference in maternal renal perfusion in normal pregnancy compared to pre-eclampsia. The lack of observed difference may be a reflection of the high variability in 3D measurements (i.e. poor investigative tool) rather than a true lack of difference in renal perfusion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29916133
doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1844-8
pii: 10.1007/s11845-018-1844-8
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
173-177Références
Kidney Int. 1998 Oct;54(4):1240-9
pubmed: 9767540
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;31(2):171-6
pubmed: 18254148
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Aug;23(8):894-9
pubmed: 20230318
Am J Hypertens. 2014 May;27(5):742-9
pubmed: 24363281
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;32(4):540-50
pubmed: 18686275
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Nov;33(8):817-20
pubmed: 24219721
Kidney Int. 2005 Jun;67(6):2101-13
pubmed: 15882253
Hypertension. 2005 Nov;46(5):1077-85
pubmed: 16230516
N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 7;355(10):992-1005
pubmed: 16957146
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;32(4):551-9
pubmed: 18726932
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003 Mar;14(3):648-52
pubmed: 12595500
Radiology. 1999 Nov;213(2):423-8
pubmed: 10551222