Site-Specific Fluorescent Labeling of Antibodies and Diabodies Using SpyTag/SpyCatcher System for In Vivo Optical Imaging.
Acute Lung Injury
/ diagnosis
Animals
Antibodies, Bispecific
/ metabolism
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ metabolism
Cell Tracking
/ methods
Cell Transplantation
/ methods
Cells, Cultured
Female
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
/ methods
Fluorescent Dyes
/ chemistry
Graft Survival
Green Fluorescent Proteins
/ genetics
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4
/ genetics
Heterografts
Humans
Ligases
/ genetics
Luciferases
/ genetics
Luminescent Measurements
/ methods
Optical Imaging
/ methods
Organ Specificity
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Rats, Transgenic
Tissue Distribution
Transgenes
Antibody
Diabody
EGFR
HER3
Near infrared imaging
Nimotuzumab
Site-specific labeling
SpyTag/SpyCatcher
Journal
Molecular imaging and biology
ISSN: 1860-2002
Titre abrégé: Mol Imaging Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101125610
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
6
2018
medline:
30
7
2019
entrez:
28
6
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Construction of antibody-based, molecular-targeted optical imaging probes requires the labeling of an antibody with a fluorophore. The most common method for doing this involves non-specifically conjugating a fluorophore to an antibody, resulting in poorly defined, heterogeneous imaging probes that often have suboptimal in vivo behavior. We tested a new strategy to site-specific label antibody-based imaging probes using the SpyCatcher/SpyTag protein ligase system. We used the SpyCatcher/SpyTag protein ligase system to site specifically label nimotuzumab, an anti-EGFR antibody and an anti-HER3 diabody. To prevent the labeling from interfering with antigen binding, we introduced the SpyTag and SpyCatcher at the C-terminus of the antibody and diabody, respectively. Expression and binding properties of the C-terminal antibody-SpyTag and diabody-SpyCatcher fusions were similar to the antibody and diabody, indicating that the SpyTag and SpyCatcher fusions were well tolerated at this position. Site-specific labeling of the antibody and diabody was performed in two steps. First, we labeled the SpyCatcher with IRDye800CW-Maleimide and the SpyTag with IRDye800CW-NHS. Second, we conjugated the IRDye800CW-SpyCatcher and the IRDye800CW-SpyTag to the antibody or diabody, respectively. We confirmed the affinity and specificity of the IRDye800CW-labeled imaging probes using biolayer interferometry and flow cytometry. We analyzed the in vivo biodistribution and tumor accumulation of the IRDye800CW-labeled nimotuzumab and anti-HER3 diabody in nude mice bearing xenografts that express EGFR and HER3, respectively. Expression and binding properties of the C-terminal antibody-SpyTag and diabody-SpyCatcher fusions were similar to the antibody and diabody, indicating that the SpyTag and SpyCatcher fusions were well tolerated at this position. We confirmed the affinity and specificity of the IRDye800CW-labeled imaging probes using biolayer interferometry and flow cytometry. We analyzed the in vivo biodistribution and tumor accumulation of the IRDye800CW-labeled nimotuzumab and anti-HER3 diabody in nude mice bearing xenografts that express EGFR and HER3, respectively. Site-specifically IRDye800CW-labeled imaging probes bound to their immobilized targets, cells expressing these targets, and selectively accumulated in xenografts. These results highlight the ease and utility of using the modular SpyTag/SpyCatcher protein ligase system for site-specific fluorescent labeling of protein-based imaging probes. Imaging probes labeled in this manner will be useful for optical imaging applications such as image-guided surgery and have broad application for other imaging modalities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29948640
doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1222-y
pii: 10.1007/s11307-018-1222-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Bispecific
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Fluorescent Dyes
0
HNF4A protein, human
0
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4
0
Green Fluorescent Proteins
147336-22-9
Luciferases
EC 1.13.12.-
Ligases
EC 6.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
54-66Références
Cancer J. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):191-7
pubmed: 18536559
J Mol Biol. 2014 Jan 23;426(2):309-17
pubmed: 24161952
J Biochem. 2017 Sep 1;162(3):203-210
pubmed: 28637250
Bioconjug Chem. 2011 Dec 21;22(12):2487-95
pubmed: 21995499
Sci Rep. 2014 Dec 01;4:7266
pubmed: 25434527
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Jun 30;126(25):7754-5
pubmed: 15212504
Br J Pharmacol. 2009 May;157(2):220-33
pubmed: 19459844
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(11):1718-29
pubmed: 23778558
J Immunol Methods. 2008 Mar 20;332(1-2):41-52
pubmed: 18230399
MAbs. 2014 Jan-Feb;6(1):46-53
pubmed: 24135651
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009 Apr;21(2):177-84
pubmed: 19208461
Mol Imaging Biol. 2016 Feb;18(1):1-17
pubmed: 26754790
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 21;9(5):6213-6227
pubmed: 29464066
Cancer Res. 2013 Oct 1;73(19):6024-35
pubmed: 23928993
Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004 Jan;17(1):21-7
pubmed: 14985534
J Mol Biol. 2013 Feb 22;425(4):803-11
pubmed: 23219464
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 16;6:39291
pubmed: 27982100
Semin Nucl Med. 2010 May;40(3):167-81
pubmed: 20350626
Bioconjug Chem. 2009 May 20;20(5):1010-5
pubmed: 19388673
Bioconjug Chem. 2008 Dec;19(12):2527-34
pubmed: 19053310
Oncol Rep. 2009 Jul;22(1):115-9
pubmed: 19513512
Chem Biol. 2015 Aug 20;22(8):1108-21
pubmed: 26211362
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 19;6:19234
pubmed: 26781591
Bioconjug Chem. 2014 Mar 19;25(3):569-78
pubmed: 24483299
Chembiochem. 2017 Nov 16;18(22):2217-2221
pubmed: 28891272
Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 15;68(14):5878-87
pubmed: 18632642
Cancer Sci. 2011 Jan;102(1):117-21
pubmed: 21070475
ACS Chem Biol. 2008 Jun 20;3(6):373-82
pubmed: 18533659
Mol Imaging Biol. 2016 Apr;18(2):153-65
pubmed: 26754791
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Sep;23(9):1126-36
pubmed: 16151406
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 20;109(12):E690-7
pubmed: 22366317
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):E1176-81
pubmed: 24639550
Chembiochem. 2017 Nov 16;18(22):2247-2259
pubmed: 28884521
Cancer Res. 2009 Mar 15;69(6):2191-4
pubmed: 19276389
mBio. 2017 Dec 12;8(6):
pubmed: 29233896
Bioconjug Chem. 2013 Oct 16;24(10):1650-5
pubmed: 24050213
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2016 Sep;11(5):328-339
pubmed: 27147480
Mol Pharm. 2013 Feb 4;10(2):709-16
pubmed: 23316869
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 30;104(44):17489-93
pubmed: 17954911
Oncologist. 2007 Dec;12(12):1379-89
pubmed: 18165614
Cell. 2014 Aug 14;158(4):945-958
pubmed: 25088144
Nat Methods. 2009 May;6(5):343-5
pubmed: 19363495