Repeatability analysis of ADC histogram metrics of the uterus.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cervix Uteri
/ diagnostic imaging
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Endometrial Hyperplasia
/ diagnostic imaging
Endometrial Neoplasms
/ pathology
Endometrium
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Uterus
/ diagnostic imaging
MR diffusion/perfusion
Uterus
histogram
repeatability
Journal
Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)
ISSN: 1600-0455
Titre abrégé: Acta Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
4
7
2018
medline:
9
4
2019
entrez:
4
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, histogram analysis based on voxel-wise apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value distribution has been increasingly performed. However, few studies have been reported regarding its repeatability. To evaluate the repeatability of ADC histogram metrics of the uterus in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-three female patients who underwent pelvic MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were prospectively included after providing informed consent. Two sequential DWI acquisitions with identical parameters and position were obtained. Regions of interest (ROIs) for histologically confirmed uterine lesions (five cervical and three endometrial cancers, and one endometrial hyperplasia) and normal appearing tissues (21 endometrium and 33 myometrium) were assigned on the first DWI dataset and then pasted onto the second DWI dataset. ADC histogram metrics within the ROIs were calculated and repeatability was evaluated by calculating within-subject coefficient of variance (%) (wCV (%)) and Bland-Altman plot (%). ADC 10%, 25%, median, 75%, 90%, maximum, mean, and entropy showed high repeatability (wCV (%) < 7, 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman plot (%) < ±20), followed by ADC minimum (wCV (%) = 8.12, 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman plot (%) < ±30). However, ADC skewness and kurtosis showed very low repeatability in all evaluations. ADC histogram metrics like ADC 10%, 25%, median, 75%, 90%, maximum, mean, and entropy are robust biomarkers and could be applicable to clinical use. However, ADC skewness and kurtosis lack robustness. Radiologists should keep these characteristics and limitations in mind when interpreting quantitative DWI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recently, histogram analysis based on voxel-wise apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value distribution has been increasingly performed. However, few studies have been reported regarding its repeatability.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the repeatability of ADC histogram metrics of the uterus in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-three female patients who underwent pelvic MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were prospectively included after providing informed consent. Two sequential DWI acquisitions with identical parameters and position were obtained. Regions of interest (ROIs) for histologically confirmed uterine lesions (five cervical and three endometrial cancers, and one endometrial hyperplasia) and normal appearing tissues (21 endometrium and 33 myometrium) were assigned on the first DWI dataset and then pasted onto the second DWI dataset. ADC histogram metrics within the ROIs were calculated and repeatability was evaluated by calculating within-subject coefficient of variance (%) (wCV (%)) and Bland-Altman plot (%).
RESULTS
RESULTS
ADC 10%, 25%, median, 75%, 90%, maximum, mean, and entropy showed high repeatability (wCV (%) < 7, 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman plot (%) < ±20), followed by ADC minimum (wCV (%) = 8.12, 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman plot (%) < ±30). However, ADC skewness and kurtosis showed very low repeatability in all evaluations.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
ADC histogram metrics like ADC 10%, 25%, median, 75%, 90%, maximum, mean, and entropy are robust biomarkers and could be applicable to clinical use. However, ADC skewness and kurtosis lack robustness. Radiologists should keep these characteristics and limitations in mind when interpreting quantitative DWI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29969050
doi: 10.1177/0284185118786062
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM