Managing geese with recreational hunters?

Adaptive management Behaviours Geese Harvest management Hunters Motivations

Journal

Ambio
ISSN: 1654-7209
Titre abrégé: Ambio
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 0364220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 02 11 2017
accepted: 14 06 2018
revised: 31 05 2018
pubmed: 5 7 2018
medline: 12 10 2019
entrez: 5 7 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As many goose populations across the northern Hemisphere continue to rise, the role of hunters to manage these populations is increasingly being considered. We studied recreational goose hunters in Denmark to assess their behavioural and motivational characteristics, willingness to alter their hunting effort, as well as their ability to act as stewards of a rapidly increasing goose population. We identified several behavioural characteristics that typify effective goose hunting practices. We suggest a degree of specialization is necessary to increase goose harvests, as well as mitigating animal welfare issues (e.g. wounding). However, the majority of Danish goose hunters can be considered to be casual participants in this form of hunting. This poses a challenge for wildlife managers wishing to engage recreational hunters to manage highly dynamic wildlife populations, such as geese. If recreational hunters are to be used as a management tool, wildlife managers and hunting organizations will need to consider how best to facilitate skill development, hunting practices and socially legitimate hunting ethics to foster the stewardship role of hunting. We conclude that it is incumbent on wildlife managers to recognize and deal with both internal factors (e.g. skill development) and external influences (e.g. animal welfare concerns). In doing so, potential tensions in the multi-functionality of hunting can be alleviated, maintain hunting as a legitimate and accepted recreational past-time and management tool.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29971665
doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1070-7
pii: 10.1007/s13280-018-1070-7
pmc: PMC6374222
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

217-229

Subventions

Organisme : 15 Juni Fonden
ID : Project Forbedret Gåsejagt

Références

Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):328-338
pubmed: 28215010
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):275-289
pubmed: 28215011
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):179-187
pubmed: 28215012
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):290-300
pubmed: 28215013
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):198-209
pubmed: 28215016

Auteurs

James Henty Williams (JH)

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Kalø, Grenavej 14, 8410, Rønde, Denmark. jhw@bios.au.dk.

Thorsten J S Balsby (TJS)

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Kalø, Grenavej 14, 8410, Rønde, Denmark.

Helle Ørsted Nielsen (H)

Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 7, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Tommy Asferg (T)

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Kalø, Grenavej 14, 8410, Rønde, Denmark.

Jesper Madsen (J)

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Kalø, Grenavej 14, 8410, Rønde, Denmark.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH