National BSUG audit of stress urinary incontinence surgery in England.
Audit
Autologous fascial sling
Colposuspension
Midurethral sling
Stress urinary incontinence
Urethral bulking
Journal
International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
04
04
2018
accepted:
19
06
2018
pubmed:
12
7
2018
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
12
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) 2013 audit for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery was to conduct a national clinical audit looking at the intra- and postoperative complications and provide outcomes for these procedures. This audit was supported by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) and National Health Service (NHS) England. Data were collected for all continence procedures performed in 2013 through the BSUG database. All clinicians in England performing SUI surgery were invited to submit data to a central database. Outcomes data for the different continence procedures were collected and included intraoperative and postoperative complications and the change in continence scores at postoperative follow-up Changing trends in stress incontinence surgery were also assessed. We recorded 4993 urinary incontinence procedures from 177 consultants at 110 centres in England: 94.6% were midurethral slings; 86.7% (4331) were submitted by BSUG members with the remaining 13.3% submitted by non-BSUG members. Postoperative follow-up data were available for 3983 (80%) patients: 92.3% (3676) were very much better/much better postoperatively, and 4806 (96.3%) proceeded with no reported complications. There were 187 cases (3.7%) in which a perioperative complication was recorded. Pain persisting >30 days was reported in 1.9% of all patients. Surgery for SUI has good outcomes in the short term. Midurethral synthetic slings have been shown to be safe and effective as a treatment option, with >90% being very much/much better at their postoperative follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29995163
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3705-4
pii: 10.1007/s00192-018-3705-4
pmc: PMC6647110
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1337-1341Références
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 May;19(5):711-5
pubmed: 18197353
Dan Med J. 2018 Feb;65(2):
pubmed: 29393041
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):12015
pubmed: 28931856
BJOG. 2006 Jan;113(1):26-9
pubmed: 16398767
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):732-6
pubmed: 11704161
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):634.e1-5
pubmed: 18060959
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):45-52
pubmed: 16021057
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1541-5
pubmed: 26992726
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Nov;21(11):1321-6
pubmed: 20559618