A minimally invasive approach for peritonectomy procedures and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in limited peritoneal carcinomatosis: The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) multi-institution analysis.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Female
Humans
Hyperthermia, Induced
/ adverse effects
Laparoscopy
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ epidemiology
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Peritoneal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Reoperation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS)
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
Laparoscopic surgery
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
17
07
2017
accepted:
06
07
2018
pubmed:
14
7
2018
medline:
28
3
2020
entrez:
14
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Minimally invasive surgery is playing an increasing role in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies as the data show reduced morbidity, faster recovery and similar oncological outcome when compared to open procedures. The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) conducted a retrospective study to analyse peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC done via the laparoscopic route. A database with standard clinical and pathological parameters was set up and distributed amongst ASPSM members. Rate of relapse, morbidity and mortality were the primary endpoints of the study. A total of 90 patients from 7 centres around the world were identified. Sixty percent were female. Mean age was 50 years. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal origin was the most common diagnosis in a 64.9% of patients and colon origin was diagnosed in 16.5% of patients. Mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 4.1 (0-10). Forty-one percent of patients had a bowel resection. Mean operative time was 4.7 h (2.5-8). All patients had a complete cytoreduction and HIPEC. Grade 3 and 4 morbidity was 3.0 and 6.5%, respectively. The most common reason for re-operation was an internal hernia in 2 out of 5 cases. Operative mortality and re-admission rates were 0 and 5%, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 7.4 days (1-18). At a mean follow-up of 31.6 months, 15/90 patients have a disease relapse but loco-regional relapse was identified in only five patients. Analysis of these data suggests that minimally invasive approach for peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC is feasible, safe and should be considered as part of the armamentarium for highly selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies with limited tumour burden, defined as PCI of 10 or less and borderline tumours as low-grade pseudomyxoma and benign multicystic mesothelioma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive surgery is playing an increasing role in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies as the data show reduced morbidity, faster recovery and similar oncological outcome when compared to open procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) conducted a retrospective study to analyse peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC done via the laparoscopic route. A database with standard clinical and pathological parameters was set up and distributed amongst ASPSM members. Rate of relapse, morbidity and mortality were the primary endpoints of the study.
RESULTS
A total of 90 patients from 7 centres around the world were identified. Sixty percent were female. Mean age was 50 years. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal origin was the most common diagnosis in a 64.9% of patients and colon origin was diagnosed in 16.5% of patients. Mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 4.1 (0-10). Forty-one percent of patients had a bowel resection. Mean operative time was 4.7 h (2.5-8). All patients had a complete cytoreduction and HIPEC. Grade 3 and 4 morbidity was 3.0 and 6.5%, respectively. The most common reason for re-operation was an internal hernia in 2 out of 5 cases. Operative mortality and re-admission rates were 0 and 5%, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 7.4 days (1-18). At a mean follow-up of 31.6 months, 15/90 patients have a disease relapse but loco-regional relapse was identified in only five patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Analysis of these data suggests that minimally invasive approach for peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC is feasible, safe and should be considered as part of the armamentarium for highly selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies with limited tumour burden, defined as PCI of 10 or less and borderline tumours as low-grade pseudomyxoma and benign multicystic mesothelioma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30003349
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6352-4
pii: 10.1007/s00464-018-6352-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
854-860Références
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):63-8
pubmed: 19917863
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;68(1):267-74
pubmed: 21499894
Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):60-4
pubmed: 20872843
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Nov;99(2):358-61
pubmed: 16112182
World J Surg. 2018 Oct;42(10):3120-3124
pubmed: 29691625
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;40(8):957-62
pubmed: 24209429
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Feb;7(1):99-111
pubmed: 26941988
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1722-5
pubmed: 25395145
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):761-77
pubmed: 26700223
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):339-44
pubmed: 17943387
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;34(2):154-8
pubmed: 17640844
Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):900-7
pubmed: 19474692
Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):764-8
pubmed: 21475017
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Dec;15(12):3623-4
pubmed: 18726653
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Nov;23(9):1699-703
pubmed: 24100589
Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1759-61
pubmed: 17024537
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug 21;12:270
pubmed: 25145962
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2449-56
pubmed: 22614976
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3:CD011390
pubmed: 27030301
Cancer J. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):190-5
pubmed: 19556903
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):1084-8
pubmed: 22634898
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:981245
pubmed: 22567001
Surg Endosc. 2000 Jan;14(1):41-4
pubmed: 10653234
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Sep;211(3):412-23
pubmed: 20800199
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1555-62
pubmed: 24368743
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8
pubmed: 23395398
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1849-55
pubmed: 22580869
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3737-44
pubmed: 22805859
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):426-8
pubmed: 18716551