High-grade soft-tissue sarcoma: optimizing injection improves MRI evaluation of tumor response.
Adult
Aged
Anthracyclines
/ therapeutic use
Area Under Curve
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
/ methods
Contrast Media
Female
Gadolinium
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ methods
ROC Curve
Retrospective Studies
Sarcoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Soft Tissue Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Chemotherapy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
Sarcoma
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
19
04
2018
accepted:
27
06
2018
revised:
31
05
2018
pubmed:
25
7
2018
medline:
26
2
2019
entrez:
25
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the acquisition delay after gadolinium-chelate injection that optimizes the prediction of the histological response during anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Thirty patients (mean age 62 years) were included in this IRB-approved study. All patients received 5-6 cycles of NAC followed by surgery. A good response was defined as ≤ 10% viable cells on histological analysis of the surgical specimen. DCE-MRI was performed before treatment (MRI There were 22 (73.3%) poor responders. Acquisition delay had a significant effect on change in CE and on the response status according to Choi (p = 0.0014 and 0.0270, respectively). The highest AUROC was obtained at t = 58 s (0.792) with an optimal threshold of a -30.5% decrease in CE. At t = 58 s, accuracy to predict a poor response was 82.8% above this threshold, while it was 72.4% and 70% with no objective response according to the Choi criteria and RECIST1.1, respectively. Optimization of acquisition delay after injection to estimate change in CE improves the prediction of histological response. For STS undergoing NAC, a 60-s delay can be recommended with MRI. • Accuracy of response criteria based on contrast enhancement, like the Choi criteria, is dependent on the acquisition delay after gadolinium-chelate injection. • DCE-MRI helps determine the optimal acquisition delay after gadolinium-chelate injection for improving evaluation of tumor response. • In soft tissue sarcoma, an acquisition delay at 60 s optimizes the evaluation of the response and accuracy of the Choi criteria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30039222
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5635-4
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5635-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anthracyclines
0
Contrast Media
0
Gadolinium
AU0V1LM3JT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
545-555Références
Eur Radiol. 2003 Aug;13(8):1849-58
pubmed: 12942285
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr 1;163(7):670-5
pubmed: 16410346
Magn Reson Med. 1991 Oct;21(2):251-63
pubmed: 1745124
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 May;27(5):1109-13
pubmed: 18425832
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):447-56
pubmed: 19261927
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 15;15(8):2856-63
pubmed: 19351756
Invest Radiol. 2010 May;45(5):233-44
pubmed: 20351653
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jun;11(6):561-70
pubmed: 20434400
Cancer. 2012 Dec 1;118(23):5857-66
pubmed: 22605504
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Dec;36(6):1300-13
pubmed: 23097185
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Dec 15;19(24):6902-11
pubmed: 24132922
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jan;51(2):202-9
pubmed: 25499439
Radiology. 2016 Mar;278(3):831-40
pubmed: 26390048
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:84-95
pubmed: 26700077
Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4640-4648
pubmed: 26960540
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jan;70:1-11
pubmed: 27866094
Tomography. 2016 Dec;2(4):308-316
pubmed: 28066805
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):812-822
pubmed: 28499583
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017 Jun;9(6):415-429
pubmed: 28607580
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):5024-5033
pubmed: 28639049
Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):1194-1203
pubmed: 28956119
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:228-235
pubmed: 28987672
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 10;36(2):125-135
pubmed: 29220291
Int J Cancer. 1984 Jan 15;33(1):37-42
pubmed: 6693192