Improved Brachial Plexus Visualization Using an Adiabatic iMSDE-Prepared STIR 3D TSE.
3-D Imaging
Brachial plexus
Fat suppression
MR neurography
Vessel suppression
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
26
03
2018
accepted:
03
07
2018
pubmed:
25
7
2018
medline:
21
4
2020
entrez:
25
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The close proximity of blood vessels to the brachial plexus nerves can confound nerve visualization in conventional fat-suppressed 3D T2-weighted sequences. Vessel suppression can be accomplished by means of motion-sensitizing preparation. The aim of this study was to qualitatively and semi-quantitatively evaluate short tau inversion recovery (STIR) 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) in conjunction with an adiabatic T2 preparation incorporating motion sensitization for magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) of the brachial plexus in a clinical routine setting. The MRN of the brachial plexus was performed in 22 patients (age 45.5 ± 20.3 years) with different clinical implications using the proposed improved motion-sensitized driven equilibrium (iMSDE) STIR 3D TSE and the STIR 3D TSE. Images were evaluated regarding image quality, overall artifacts, artifacts caused by vessel signal, signal homogeneity, visibility of small nerves and signal contrast. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratios (aSNR), nerve muscle contrast to noise ratios (aNMCNR) and nerve vessel contrast to noise ratios (aNVCNR) were calculated and compared. The incorporation of motion sensitization in the T2 preparation resulted in robust blood suppression across subjects, leading to significantly higher aNVCNRs (p < 0.001) and aNMCNRs (p < 0.05), increased conspicuousness of the nerves, better vessel suppression and image quality and less artifacts compared with STIR 3D TSE (p < 0.001). The incorporation of the proposed adiabatic iMSDE-based motion sensitization was shown to provide robust blood suppression of vessels in close proximity to brachial plexus nerves. The use of STIR iMSDE 3D TSE can be considered for clinical MRN examinations of the brachial plexus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30039352
doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0706-0
pii: 10.1007/s00062-018-0706-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
631-638Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : ERC-StG 2014 iBack
Pays : International
Références
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Nov;70(5):1360-8
pubmed: 23213005
Eur J Radiol. 2010 May;74(2):403-10
pubmed: 20223611
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010 Sep;15(3):185-95
pubmed: 21040140
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015 Apr;19(2):86-93
pubmed: 25764232
Neurol Clin. 2007 Feb;25(1):1-28
pubmed: 17324718
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Mar;43(3):644-54
pubmed: 26251015
J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;112(2):362-71
pubmed: 19663545
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010 Dec;15(4):295-301
pubmed: 21199100
Invest Radiol. 2018 Mar;53(3):158-166
pubmed: 28976477
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010 Mar;15(1):1-9
pubmed: 20433600
Radiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:809568
pubmed: 23589774
NMR Biomed. 2017 Nov;30(11):null
pubmed: 28777496
Eur Radiol. 2008 May;18(5):1018-23
pubmed: 18180925
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):407-415
pubmed: 28261861
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(2):111-9
pubmed: 23666153
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jun;61(6):1326-35
pubmed: 19319903
Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Oct;40(10):1249-60
pubmed: 21547613
Radiology. 2016 May;279(2):553-61
pubmed: 26583760
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010 Nov;14(5):523-46
pubmed: 21072730
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):1672-7
pubmed: 25638217
Radiology. 2017 May;283(2):538-546
pubmed: 28005489
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Apr;84(4):696-702
pubmed: 25623827
Eur Radiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):447-453
pubmed: 27208993
Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Jun;40(6):717-24
pubmed: 20972564
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):486-97
pubmed: 22976233