Ergonomic assessment of the first assistant during robot-assisted surgery.
Ergonomics
Operation room work environment
Robot-assisted surgery
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
27
04
2018
accepted:
09
07
2018
pubmed:
26
7
2018
medline:
11
7
2019
entrez:
26
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of the da Vinci robot in minimal invasive surgery comes with numerous advantages. Recent papers describe improvements in the ergonomic environment and benefits for the surgeon's posture in the console. Ergonomics for first assistants or scrub nurses at the OR table during robot-assisted procedures, however, have gained minor attention. The aim of this study, therefore, is to analyse the ergonomic environment specifically for first assistants during robot-assisted surgery. Three techniques were used to evaluate body posture and ergonomics during three discriminated actions. First of all, a questionnaire was conducted. Second, sagittal and dorsal photographs of all first assistants were shot. From these photographs, joint angles of the trunk, neck, shoulder, elbow, pelvic girdle and spine were calculated and rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) scores were determined. In addition, intra-observer variability was assessed to determine the robustness of the results. Lastly, the number of obstructions during the surgery was registered by an observer present at the operation theatre. The questionnaires displayed that 73% of the first assistants were in uncomfortable working positions for longer periods of time. Twenty percent of the participants even report pain or visible bruising due to hinderance of the robot arm. Furthermore, an average of 2.8 obstructions per surgical procedure was registered, mainly affecting the lower arm (60%). The photographs demonstrated that all joint angles, except for the elbow joint, are potentially harmful when assisting during robot-assisted surgery. RULA scores revealed high-risk ergonomic risk scores for all measured actions. Tissue traction was recognized as the action with the highest physical workload. During robot-assisted surgery, first assistants experience non-ergonomic trunk, neck and shoulder angles. These recordings are supported by posture analysis. Tissue traction is reported as the most intensive action by the nurses. Tacking, however, can lead to the most unfavourable RULA score. The surgeon's awareness of the position of the robot arms could reduce the number of obstructive moments for the first assistant. Lowering the number of instrument replacements is plausible to lead to better ergonomic postures for first assistant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30043126
doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0851-0
pii: 10.1007/s11701-018-0851-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
283-288Références
Ergonomics. 2001 Oct 10;44(12):1038-55
pubmed: 11780727
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1077-81
pubmed: 12728378
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):14-21
pubmed: 14685095
Appl Ergon. 1993 Apr;24(2):91-9
pubmed: 15676903
Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1879-82
pubmed: 17031749
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Apr;19(2):105-9
pubmed: 20158410
J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):605-11
pubmed: 24417180
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;28(1):225-32
pubmed: 24485268
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3379-84
pubmed: 24928233
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):253-88
pubmed: 25380708
J Robot Surg. 2007;1(1):61-7
pubmed: 25484939
Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):376-81
pubmed: 25801191
Arab J Urol. 2012 Mar;10(1):23-31
pubmed: 26558001
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):905-920
pubmed: 28306646