New diagnostic tools for prosthetic joint infection.


Journal

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 29 01 2018
revised: 20 04 2018
accepted: 26 04 2018
pubmed: 30 7 2018
medline: 17 1 2020
entrez: 30 7 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The diagnosis of peri-prosthetic bone and joint infections relies on converging information from clinical, laboratory and imaging assessments. Clinical findings alone may suffice: a sinus tract is a major criterion that establishes the diagnosis of infection. Identifying the causative organism is crucial and requires the early collection of high-quality samples from sites in contact with the prosthetic material. The bacteriological samples may be obtained by aspiration or open surgery. Imaging techniques have undergone remarkable improvements over the last two decades. Ultrasonography can be performed early and can be used to guide a needle biopsy if appropriate. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging shows the extent of bone and/or soft-tissue involvement, provided effective artefact-suppression techniques are applied. Nuclear medicine methods have an undefined place in the diagnostic strategy and their possible role must be evaluated during a multidisciplinary discussion. The array of new laboratory methods introduced in recent years includes microbiological culture techniques, molecular biology tests, antigen and antibody assays and tests for immune markers in blood and/or joint fluid. When the first-line investigations fail to provide a definitive diagnosis, a multidisciplinary discussion at a referral centre for complex osteo-articular infections makes a major contribution to defining the subsequent diagnostic strategy. This lecture focusses on the following six questions: does the clinical assessment still have diagnostic relevance? What is the diagnostic contribution of imaging studies? Must the infection be documented pre-operatively and if so, how? Which microbiological techniques should be used? Which non-microbiological investigations help to diagnosis peri-prosthetic bone and joint infections? What role do referral centres for complex bone and joint infections play in the diagnostic strategy?

Identifiants

pubmed: 30056239
pii: S1877-0568(18)30198-1
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.029
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Interleukins 0
C-Reactive Protein 9007-41-4

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S23-S30

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Cédric Arvieux (C)

Service des maladies infectieuses et réanimation médicale, CHU de Rennes, 35033 Rennes, France; Centre de référence en infections ostéo-articulaires du Grand-Ouest (CRIOGO), 35033 Rennes, France. Electronic address: cedric.arvieux@chu-rennes.fr.

Harold Common (H)

Service d'orthopédie et traumatologie, CHU de Rennes, 35033 Rennes, France; Centre de référence en infections ostéo-articulaires du Grand-Ouest (CRIOGO), 35033 Rennes, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH