Long-Term Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Care at Regionalized Centers.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
/ methods
Emergency Medical Services
/ methods
Female
Humans
Male
Maryland
Middle Aged
Ohio
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
/ epidemiology
Patient Transfer
Pennsylvania
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Transportation of Patients
West Virginia
Journal
Annals of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1097-6760
Titre abrégé: Ann Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8002646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
14
02
2018
revised:
04
05
2018
accepted:
16
05
2018
pubmed:
1
8
2018
medline:
24
10
2019
entrez:
1
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is unknown whether regionalization of postarrest care by interfacility transfer to cardiac arrest receiving centers reduces mortality. We seek to evaluate whether treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center, whether by direct transport or early interfacility transfer, is independently associated with long-term outcome. We performed a retrospective cohort study including adults resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in southwestern Pennsylvania and neighboring Ohio, West Virginia, and Maryland, which includes approximately 5.7 million residents in urban, suburban, and rural counties. Patients were treated by 1 of 78 ground emergency medical services agencies or 2 air medical transport agencies between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2014. Our primary exposures of interest were interfacility transfer to a cardiac arrest receiving center within 24 hours of arrest or any treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center regardless of transfer status. Our primary outcome was vital status, assessed through December 31, 2014, with National Death Index records. We used unadjusted and adjusted survival analyses to test the independent association of cardiac arrest receiving center care, whether through direct or interfacility transport, on mortality. Overall, 5,217 cases were observed for 3,629 person-years, with 3,865 total deaths. Most patients (82%) were treated at 42 non-cardiac arrest receiving centers with median annual volume of 17 cases (interquartile range 1 to 53 cases per center annually), whereas 18% were cared for at cardiac arrest receiving centers receiving at least 1 interfacility transfer per month. In adjusted models, treatment at a cardiac arrest receiving center was independently associated with reduced hazard of death compared with treatment at a non-cardiac arrest receiving center (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.94). These effects were unchanged when analysis was restricted to patients brought from the scene to the treating hospital. No other hospital characteristic, including total out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient volume and cardiac catheterization capabilities, independently predicted outcome. Both early interfacility transfer to a cardiac arrest receiving center and direct transport to a cardiac arrest receiving center from the scene are independently associated with reduced mortality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30060961
pii: S0196-0644(18)30455-4
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.05.018
pmc: PMC6429559
mid: NIHMS1012607
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
29-39Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K08 HL122478
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K12 HL109068
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K23 NS097629
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;120(3):421-427
pubmed: 28583683
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1779-89
pubmed: 25438253
Resuscitation. 2012 Jul;83(7):862-8
pubmed: 22353637
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):366-78
pubmed: 16436768
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jan 31;3(1):e000400
pubmed: 24487717
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360
pubmed: 26673558
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Mar;35(3):505-11
pubmed: 18936907
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S465-82
pubmed: 26472996
Bull Am Coll Surg. 1990 Sep;75(9):20-9
pubmed: 10106239
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):496-506.e1
pubmed: 25064741
Resuscitation. 2017 Sep;118:63-69
pubmed: 28648808
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:283608
pubmed: 26421282
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Aug 15;170(4):515-8
pubmed: 19567777
Resuscitation. 2009 Jan;80(1):30-4
pubmed: 18952359
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1084-1150
pubmed: 28919115
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(8):905-9
pubmed: 27027857
Resuscitation. 2010 May;81(5):524-9
pubmed: 20071070
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec 1;140(11):1016-9
pubmed: 7985649
Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):725-738
pubmed: 27025938
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):217-23
pubmed: 24401209
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Jun;72(6):634-41
pubmed: 25844993
Resuscitation. 2015 Jun;91:108-15
pubmed: 25676321
Resuscitation. 2016 May;102:127-35
pubmed: 26836944
JAMA. 1985 Mar 1;253(9):1292-5
pubmed: 3968855
Stat Med. 2017 Mar 15;36(6):928-938
pubmed: 27885709
Clin Chest Med. 2016 Jun;37(2):367-80
pubmed: 27229651
Circulation. 2005 Mar 1;111(8):1078-91
pubmed: 15738362
Semin Neurol. 2017 Feb;37(1):19-24
pubmed: 28147414
Circulation. 2010 Feb 9;121(5):709-29
pubmed: 20075331
Resuscitation. 2016 Sep;106:42-8
pubmed: 27368428
J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Sep;40(9):808-13
pubmed: 9777565
Resuscitation. 2018 Apr;125:126-134
pubmed: 29337172
Circulation. 2016 May 31;133(22):2159-68
pubmed: 27081119
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Nov;30(11):2126-8
pubmed: 15365608
Resuscitation. 2016 Nov;108:48-53
pubmed: 27650862
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Feb;42(2):137-46
pubmed: 26626062