Sedation during minimal invasive surfactant therapy: a randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
ISSN: 1468-2052
Titre abrégé: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9501297

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 20 02 2018
revised: 28 05 2018
accepted: 06 07 2018
pubmed: 3 8 2018
medline: 27 6 2019
entrez: 3 8 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although sedation for endotracheal intubation of infants is widely adopted, there is no consensus whether sedation should be used for minimal invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). We compared, in a randomised controlled setting, the level of stress and comfort of preterm infants during MIST with and without receiving low-dose sedation. Infants between 26 and 36 weeks gestational age were randomised to receive either low-dose sedation (1 mg/kg propofol intravenous) or no premedication during MIST procedure. Standard comfort care was given in both groups, which consisted of administering sucrose in the cheek pouch of the infant and containment. Primary end point was the percentage of infants assessed to be comfortable during the procedure (COMFORTneo-score <14). Secondary parameters included complications of both the MIST procedure and low-dose sedation administration. In total, 78 infants were randomised and analysed, with a median (IQR) gestational age of 29 Low-dose sedation increased comfort during MIST procedure in preterm infants, but the need for transient non-invasive ventilation was increased. NTR5010, pre-results.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Although sedation for endotracheal intubation of infants is widely adopted, there is no consensus whether sedation should be used for minimal invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). We compared, in a randomised controlled setting, the level of stress and comfort of preterm infants during MIST with and without receiving low-dose sedation.
METHODS METHODS
Infants between 26 and 36 weeks gestational age were randomised to receive either low-dose sedation (1 mg/kg propofol intravenous) or no premedication during MIST procedure. Standard comfort care was given in both groups, which consisted of administering sucrose in the cheek pouch of the infant and containment. Primary end point was the percentage of infants assessed to be comfortable during the procedure (COMFORTneo-score <14). Secondary parameters included complications of both the MIST procedure and low-dose sedation administration.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 78 infants were randomised and analysed, with a median (IQR) gestational age of 29
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Low-dose sedation increased comfort during MIST procedure in preterm infants, but the need for transient non-invasive ventilation was increased.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER BACKGROUND
NTR5010, pre-results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30068669
pii: archdischild-2018-315015
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315015
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hypnotics and Sedatives 0
Pulmonary Surfactants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

F378-F383

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Janneke Dekker (J)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Enrico Lopriore (E)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Henriëtte A van Zanten (HA)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Ratna N G B Tan (RNGB)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Stuart B Hooper (SB)

The Ritchie Center, MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, The Netherlands.

Arjan B Te Pas (AB)

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH