Urethral reconstruction in patients previously treated with Memokath™ urethral endoprosthesis.

Reconstrucción uretral en pacientes previamente tratados con endoprótesis uretral Memokath™.

Journal

Actas urologicas espanolas
ISSN: 2173-5786
Titre abrégé: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101771154

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 28 05 2018
accepted: 29 05 2018
pubmed: 14 8 2018
medline: 14 7 2020
entrez: 14 8 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the role and success rate of urethral reconstruction in patients with urethral stricture previously treated with thermos-expandable Memokath™ urethral endoprosthesis. A case series of patients with urethral stricture and Memokath™ endoprosthesis treated with urethroplasty is presented. Reconstruction was decided due to stricture progression or complications derived from primary stent treatment. Age, stricture and stent length, time between stent placement and urethroplasty, mode of stent retrieval, type of urethroplasty, complications and voiding parameters before and after urethroplasty were evaluated. Successful outcome was defined as standard voiding, without need of any postoperative procedure. Eight cases with bulbar urethra stricture were included. Memokath™ was endoscopically retrieved before urethroplasty in 6 (75%) and by open urethrotomy at the time of urethroplasty in 2 (25%). Technique of urethroplasty was dorso-lateral onlay buccal mucosa graft in 5 (62.5%) cases and excision and primary anastomosis, anastomotic urethroplasty, and dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft in one (12.5%) case each. There was no failure at 26±21.5 months median follow-up. Total IPSS, QoL, Qmax and postvoid residual significantly improved (P<.05). The only complication presented was epididymitis and penile shortening in one patient (12.5%). Urethroplasty after re-stricture or other complications in patients with temporary Memokath™ urethral stent is a viable and definite option of reconstruction with excellent results in the short term and few complications. One-side dorsolateral onlay buccal mucosa graft augmentation is the optimal technique for this indication.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30100140
pii: S0210-4806(18)30141-4
doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.05.013
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng spa

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

26-31

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 AEU. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

J C Angulo (JC)

Departamento Clínico, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Getafe, Madrid, España. Electronic address: javier.angulo@salud.madrid.org.

J Pankaj (J)

Kulkarni Center for Reconstructive Urology, Pune, India.

I Arance (I)

Departamento Clínico, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Getafe, Madrid, España.

S Kulkarni (S)

Kulkarni Center for Reconstructive Urology, Pune, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH