Minimally Invasive Redo-Aortic Valve Replacement: Reduced Operative Times as Compared to Full Sternotomy.
Aged
Aortic Valve
/ surgery
Austria
/ epidemiology
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Humans
Italy
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prevalence
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sternotomy
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
ISSN: 1439-1902
Titre abrégé: Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7903387
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
8
2018
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
17
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Increasing experience with minimally invasive cardiac (MIC) aortic valve (AV) replacement makes AV reoperations (rAVR) an appealing alternative to conventional redo surgery. The aim of the study was to compare the perioperative outcome after isolated MIC versus full-sternotomy (FS) rAVR. We retrospectively analyzed data of 116 patients from three centers who underwent rAVR by using a FS ( There was no statistically significant difference in perioperative mortality between FS ( MIC rAVR is associated with reduced cardiopulmonary and cross-clamp times as well as the need for RRT as compared with FS. MIC-rAVR seems to be a viable option in surgical candidates for AV reoperations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30114714
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668497
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
141-147Informations de copyright
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.