Recipient hypertonic saline infusion prevents cardiac allograft dysfunction.
Allografts
Animals
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
/ adverse effects
Coronary Vessels
/ physiopathology
Disease Models, Animal
Endothelium, Vascular
/ physiopathology
Female
Fluid Therapy
Heart Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Infusions, Intravenous
Interleukin-2
/ metabolism
Interleukin-6
/ metabolism
Lung
/ metabolism
Lung Injury
/ etiology
Saline Solution, Hypertonic
/ administration & dosage
Sus scrofa
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
/ metabolism
Vasodilation
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
/ etiology
Ventricular Function, Left
heart transplantation
myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury
myocardial protection
Journal
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-685X
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
02
11
2017
revised:
08
06
2018
accepted:
06
07
2018
pubmed:
20
8
2018
medline:
25
2
2020
entrez:
20
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hypertonic saline (HTS) has potent immune and vascular effects. We assessed recipient pretreatment with HTS on allograft function in a porcine model of heart transplantation and hypothesized that HTS infusion would limit endothelial and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction following transplantation. Heart transplants were performed after 6 hours of cold ischemic storage. Recipient pigs were randomized to treatment with or without HTS (7.5% NaCl) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Using a myograft apparatus, coronary artery endothelial-dependent (Edep) and -independent (Eind) relaxation was assessed. LV performance was determined using pressure-volume loop analysis. Pulmonary interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α expression was measured. Weaning from CPB and LV performance after transplantation were improved in HTS-treated animals. Successful weaning from CPB was greater in the HTS-treated hearts (8 of 8 vs 2 of 8; P < .05). Mean LV functional recovery was improved in the HTS-treated animals, as assessed by preload recruitable stroke work (65 ± 10% vs 27 ± 10%; P < .001) and end-systolic elastance (55 ± 7% vs 37 ± 4%; P < .001). Treatment with HTS resulted in improved Edep (mean maximum elastance [Emax], 56 ± 5% vs 37 ± 7%; P < .001) and Eind (mean Emax%, 77 ± 6% vs 52 ± 4%; P < .001) vasorelaxation compared with control. Pulmonary expression of IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α increased following transplantation, whereas HTS therapy attenuated IL production (P < .001). Transplantation increased plasma TNF-α levels and LV TNF-α expression, whereas HTS prevented this up-regulation (P < .001). Recipient HTS pretreatment preserves allograft vasomotor and LV function, and HTS therapy limits CPB-induced injury. HTS may be a novel recipient intervention to prevent graft dysfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30121134
pii: S0022-5223(18)31860-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.018
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Interleukin-2
0
Interleukin-6
0
Saline Solution, Hypertonic
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
615-625.e1Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.