Determinants of Exercise Performance in Children and Adolescents with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Using Stress Echocardiography.
Adolescent
Age Factors
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Echocardiography
Echocardiography, Stress
Exercise
/ physiology
Exercise Test
/ methods
Female
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency
/ physiopathology
Tetralogy of Fallot
/ physiopathology
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Ventricular Function, Right
Young Adult
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Congenital heart disease
Stress echocardiography
Tetralogy of Fallot
Journal
Pediatric cardiology
ISSN: 1432-1971
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003849
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
10
04
2018
accepted:
11
08
2018
pubmed:
20
8
2018
medline:
28
2
2019
entrez:
20
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Exercise performance is variable and often impaired in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). We sought to identify factors associated with exercise performance by comparing high to low performers on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients with rTOF. We conducted a cross-sectional study of subjects presenting for CPET who underwent echocardiograms at rest and peak exercise. Patients with pacemakers and arrhythmias were excluded. Right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal strain was used as a measure of systolic function. Pulmonary insufficiency (PI) was assessed with the diastolic systolic ratio and the diastolic systolic time-velocity integral ratio by Doppler interrogation of the pulmonary artery. CPET measures included percent-predicted maximum [Formula: see text][Formula: see text], percent-predicted maximum work and oxygen pulse. High versus low performers were identified as those achieving [Formula: see text] of at least 80% or falling below, respectively. Differences in echocardiographic parameters from rest to peak exercise were examined using mixed-effects regression models. Compared to the low performers (n = 17), high performers (n = 12) were younger (12.8 ± 3.3 years vs. 18.3 ± 4.8 years), had normal chronotropic response (peak heart rate > 185 bpm) with greater heart rate reserve and superior physical working capacity. High performers also had a greater reduction in PI at peak exercise, despite greater PI severity at rest. Oxygen pulse was comparable between groups. For both groups, there was no association of PI severity and RV systolic function at rest with exercise parameters. There was no group difference in the magnitude of change in RV strain and diastolic parameters from rest to peak exercise. Chronotropic response to exercise appears to be an important parameter with which to assess exercise performance in rTOF. Chronotropic health should be taken into consideration in this population, particularly given that RV function and PI severity at rest were not associated with exercise performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30121867
doi: 10.1007/s00246-018-1962-0
pii: 10.1007/s00246-018-1962-0
pmc: PMC6349539
mid: NIHMS994488
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
71-78Subventions
Organisme : Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
ID : Cardiac Center Grant
Organisme : Matthew's Hearts of Hope
ID : Research Grant
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007915
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institutes of Health
ID : F32HL139042
Organisme : National Institutes of Health
ID : K01HL125521
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : F32 HL139042
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K01 HL125521
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institutes of Health
ID : 5T32HL007915
Références
Am Heart J. 1999 Aug;138(2 Pt 1):233-40
pubmed: 10426833
Pediatr Cardiol. 2000 May-Jun;21(3):211-5
pubmed: 10818175
Circulation. 2000 Nov 7;102(19 Suppl 3):III116-22
pubmed: 11082373
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Jul;122(1):154-61
pubmed: 11436049
Pediatr Cardiol. 2002 Mar-Apr;23(2):224-9
pubmed: 11889543
Cardiol Young. 2002 Dec;12(6):554-9
pubmed: 12636004
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 May 15;167(10):1451; author reply 1451
pubmed: 12738602
Circulation. 2003 Sep 9;108 Suppl 1:II180-5
pubmed: 12970229
Circulation. 2005 Aug 9;112(6):828-35
pubmed: 16061735
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 19;48(6):1250-6
pubmed: 16979014
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;99(10):1462-7
pubmed: 17493481
J Card Fail. 2007 May;13(4):263-8
pubmed: 17517345
Pediatr Cardiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;28(4):276-9
pubmed: 17530324
Heart. 2007 Jul;93(7):880-9
pubmed: 17569817
Am Heart J. 2007 Jul;154(1):165-71
pubmed: 17584572
Am Heart J. 2008 Jul;156(1):100-5
pubmed: 18585503
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jul 8;52(2):99-107
pubmed: 18598887
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Feb;17(2):461-6
pubmed: 1991905
Circulation. 2010 Nov 9;122(19):1957-67
pubmed: 21060085
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 1;108(1):99-105
pubmed: 21529748
Circulation. 2012 Jan 17;125(2):250-9
pubmed: 22147905
Heart. 2012 Nov;98(21):1595-9
pubmed: 22869677
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):637-43
pubmed: 22869820
Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Apr;34(4):853-60
pubmed: 23104594
Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2012 Jul;5(2):151-5
pubmed: 23129904
Circulation. 2014 Aug 26;130(9):749-56
pubmed: 24944314
Congenit Heart Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr;10(2):169-79
pubmed: 25196468
Circulation. 1989 Aug;80(2):314-23
pubmed: 2546698
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):178-81
pubmed: 25499372
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Oct 1;196:158-64
pubmed: 26114442
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):240-246
pubmed: 27837302
J Pediatr. 2017 Oct;189:162-168
pubmed: 28734657
Am Heart J. 1986 Nov;112(5):998-1003
pubmed: 3776826
Br Heart J. 1979 Jun;41(6):683-91
pubmed: 465243
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Mar;56(3):628-34
pubmed: 6706770
Br Heart J. 1995 May;73(5):445-9
pubmed: 7786660
Circulation. 1995 Mar 15;91(6):1775-81
pubmed: 7882487
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Sep;27(9):1292-301
pubmed: 8531628
Circulation. 1996 Apr 15;93(8):1485-7
pubmed: 8608613
Am J Cardiol. 1998 May 15;81(10):1217-9
pubmed: 9604951
Pediatr Cardiol. 1999 Jan-Feb;20(1):39-47; discussion 48
pubmed: 9861075