Implant Removal Matrix for the Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgeon.

ankle injuries diagnostic and therapeutic techniques foot surgery techniques forefoot-toe-midfoot general disorders heel-rearfoot-ankle implants reconstructive foot and ankle surgery surgical complications

Journal

Foot & ankle specialist
ISSN: 1938-7636
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Spec
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101473598

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 23 8 2018
medline: 18 5 2019
entrez: 23 8 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Orthopaedic surgery frequently requires the use of metal plate and screw constructs for osteosynthesis. These constructs may be subsequently removed for a variety of indications. In the lower extremity in particular, implants (ie, hardware) can lead to prominence and pain secondary to a thin soft-tissue envelope with little subcutaneous tissue. Often, removal is performed without knowledge of the exact type of screw head configuration and/or size, which can make removal technically challenging. The purpose of this study is to consolidate screw head sizes and configurations from commonly utilized orthopaedic foot and ankle implant manufacturers matched against 2 commonly used universal implant removal sets to aid in the expeditious removal of hardware. Orthopaedic manufacturers of foot and ankle-specific implants were included based on market share. Publicly available information on screw size, head configuration, and driver size was collected and recorded. This information was cross-referenced against the drivers available in 2 commonly utilized universal implant removal sets. Seven foot and ankle implant manufacturers were included. The data were compiled in table format according to manufacturer and subcategorized by noncannulated screws, cannulated screws, and locking screws. Many factors affect the success of hardware removal, and it is imperative that the surgeon knows which drivers are compatible with the implanted hardware. The expanding magnitude and diversity of orthopaedic implants makes removal of hardware more challenging. A guide of compatible drivers for various screw types helps expedite this procedure. Level V.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Orthopaedic surgery frequently requires the use of metal plate and screw constructs for osteosynthesis. These constructs may be subsequently removed for a variety of indications. In the lower extremity in particular, implants (ie, hardware) can lead to prominence and pain secondary to a thin soft-tissue envelope with little subcutaneous tissue. Often, removal is performed without knowledge of the exact type of screw head configuration and/or size, which can make removal technically challenging. The purpose of this study is to consolidate screw head sizes and configurations from commonly utilized orthopaedic foot and ankle implant manufacturers matched against 2 commonly used universal implant removal sets to aid in the expeditious removal of hardware.
METHODS METHODS
Orthopaedic manufacturers of foot and ankle-specific implants were included based on market share. Publicly available information on screw size, head configuration, and driver size was collected and recorded. This information was cross-referenced against the drivers available in 2 commonly utilized universal implant removal sets.
RESULTS RESULTS
Seven foot and ankle implant manufacturers were included. The data were compiled in table format according to manufacturer and subcategorized by noncannulated screws, cannulated screws, and locking screws.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Many factors affect the success of hardware removal, and it is imperative that the surgeon knows which drivers are compatible with the implanted hardware. The expanding magnitude and diversity of orthopaedic implants makes removal of hardware more challenging. A guide of compatible drivers for various screw types helps expedite this procedure.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE METHODS
Level V.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30132700
doi: 10.1177/1938640018791015
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

79-97

Auteurs

Philip B Kaiser (PB)

Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts (PBK, IW, MDR).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (JB, JYK).

Ian Watkins (I)

Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts (PBK, IW, MDR).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (JB, JYK).

Matthew D Riedel (MD)

Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts (PBK, IW, MDR).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (JB, JYK).

Patrick Cronin (P)

Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts (PBK, IW, MDR).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (JB, JYK).

Jorge Briceno (J)

Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts (PBK, IW, MDR).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (JB, JYK).

John Y Kwon (JY)

Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts (PBK, IW, MDR).
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (JB, JYK).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH