Estrogen metabolism in menopausal hormone users in the women's health initiative observational study: Does it differ between estrogen plus progestin and estrogen alone?
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Case-Control Studies
Drug Therapy, Combination
Estrogen Replacement Therapy
/ methods
Estrogens
/ administration & dosage
Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
/ administration & dosage
Middle Aged
Postmenopause
Progestins
/ administration & dosage
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
conjugated equine estrogens
conjugated equine estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate
estrogen alone
estrogen metabolism
estrogen plus progestin
women's health initiative observational study
Journal
International journal of cancer
ISSN: 1097-0215
Titre abrégé: Int J Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0042124
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 02 2019
15 02 2019
Historique:
received:
17
05
2018
revised:
18
07
2018
accepted:
30
07
2018
pubmed:
6
9
2018
medline:
28
5
2019
entrez:
6
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The WHI found an unexpected reduced breast cancer risk in women using CEE alone. We hypothesized CEE alone induces estrogen hydroxylation along the 2-pathway rather than the competing 16-pathway, a pattern linked to reduced postmenopausal breast cancer risk. One thousand eight hundred and sixty-four women in a WHIOS case-control study of estrogen metabolism and ovarian and endometrial cancer were studied of whom 609 were current E + P users (351 used CEE + MPA), while 272 used E alone (162 used CEE). Fifteen EM were measured, and analyses were conducted for each metabolite, hydroxylation pathway (2-, 4-, or 16-pathway) and ratios of pathway concentrations using inverse probability weighted linear regression. Compared to E + P users, all EM were higher in E alone users (significant for unconjugated estrone, total/conjugated estradiol, total/unconjugated 2-methoxyestrone, 4-methoxyestrone and unconjugated estriol). The relative concentrations of 2- and 4-pathway EM did not differ between the MHT users (2-pathway EM comprised 15% and 4-pathway EM <2% of the total), but 16-pathway EM were lower in E alone users (p = 0.036). Ratios of 2- and 4-pathway EM compared to 16-pathway EM were significantly higher in E alone compared to E + P users. Similar but not significant patterns were observed in CEE-alone and CEE + MPA users. Our data suggest that compared to E + P users, women using E alone have more extensive metabolism via the 2- vs. the competing 16-pathway. This is consistent with epidemiologic evidence of reduced postmenopausal breast cancer risk associated with this metabolic profile and may provide a clue to the breast cancer risk reduction in CEE alone users during the WHI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30183089
doi: 10.1002/ijc.31851
pmc: PMC6746113
mid: NIHMS1044525
doi:
Substances chimiques
Estrogens
0
Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)
0
Progestins
0
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
C2QI4IOI2G
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
730-740Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600002C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600018C
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA CP010126-21
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600003C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600004C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268201600001C
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Références
Lancet. 1997 Oct 11;350(9084):1047-59
pubmed: 10213546
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2000;(27):95-112
pubmed: 10963622
JAMA. 2003 Jun 25;289(24):3243-53
pubmed: 12824205
Lancet. 2003 Aug 9;362(9382):419-27
pubmed: 12927427
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Sep 21;97(18):1366-76
pubmed: 16174858
Maturitas. 2006 Apr 20;54(1):72-7
pubmed: 16213115
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 19;354(3):270-82
pubmed: 16421368
JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1647-57
pubmed: 16609086
Anal Chem. 2007 Oct 15;79(20):7813-21
pubmed: 17848096
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 May 15;167(10):1207-16
pubmed: 18372396
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jun 15;167(12):1407-15
pubmed: 18448442
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 5;360(6):573-87
pubmed: 19196674
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Feb;1155:57-67
pubmed: 19250192
Nutr Cancer. 2009;61(3):408-14
pubmed: 19373615
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jan;19(1):292-300
pubmed: 20056650
Menopause. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):622-9
pubmed: 20215977
Int J Womens Health. 2011 Feb 08;3:37-51
pubmed: 21339936
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Feb 22;104(4):326-39
pubmed: 22232133
Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):476-86
pubmed: 22401913
Hum Hered. 2012;73(3):159-73
pubmed: 22710642
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Nov;21(11):2022-32
pubmed: 22933427
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Apr 17;105(8):526-35
pubmed: 23543779
Breast Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 22;15(2):R34
pubmed: 23607871
JAMA. 2013 Oct 2;310(13):1353-68
pubmed: 24084921
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014 Jul;142:16-29
pubmed: 24176763
Carcinogenesis. 2014 Feb;35(2):346-55
pubmed: 24213602
Steroids. 2015 Jul;99(Pt A):67-75
pubmed: 25725255
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):296-305
pubmed: 26181174
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Apr;25(4):648-56
pubmed: 26908437
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jul;25(7):1081-9
pubmed: 27197275
Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 15;77(4):918-925
pubmed: 28011624
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;464:138-51
pubmed: 3014947
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):7831-5
pubmed: 3186693
J Endocrinol. 1996 Sep;150 Suppl:S259-65
pubmed: 8943806
Control Clin Trials. 1998 Feb;19(1):61-109
pubmed: 9492970
Cancer Res. 1998 Jun 1;58(11):2269-77
pubmed: 9622057