Neurophysiological Changes Associated with Antidepressant Response to Ketamine Not Observed in a Negative Trial of Scopolamine in Major Depressive Disorder.


Journal

The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology
ISSN: 1469-5111
Titre abrégé: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815893

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 01 2019
Historique:
received: 03 03 2018
accepted: 27 07 2018
pubmed: 6 9 2018
medline: 31 12 2019
entrez: 6 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial examined the antidepressant efficacy of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine in major depressive disorder subjects with more severe and refractory forms of major depressive disorder relative to previous reports. Participants included 23 medication-free major depressive disorder subjects (12 F/11 M, 20-55 years) currently experiencing a major depressive episode. Subjects had scored ≥20 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Following a single-blind, placebo lead-in, participants were randomized to receive 2 counterbalanced blocks of 3 i.v. infusions of scopolamine (4 μg/kg) and placebo in a double-blind manner. The primary and secondary outcomes were the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, respectively. Magnetoencephalography and plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations were obtained prior to and after each treatment phase. As assessed by both the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, scopolamine had no significant antidepressant or anxiolytic effects relative to placebo. No significant drug vs placebo effects were seen in magnetoencephalography gamma power or brain-derived neurotrophic factor plasma concentrations, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor changes did not correlate with change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score in response to scopolamine. These results do not support the efficacy of scopolamine for more severe or refractory forms of depression. No pre- to post-infusion changes in plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor were detected, and magnetoencephalography gamma power changed only in the placebo lead-in, suggesting that these biomarker measures were not affected by scopolamine in this cohort. While difficult to interpret given the lack of antidepressant response, the findings suggest that the neurobiological effects of ketamine and scopolamine are at least partly distinct.

Sections du résumé

Background
This randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial examined the antidepressant efficacy of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine in major depressive disorder subjects with more severe and refractory forms of major depressive disorder relative to previous reports.
Methods
Participants included 23 medication-free major depressive disorder subjects (12 F/11 M, 20-55 years) currently experiencing a major depressive episode. Subjects had scored ≥20 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Following a single-blind, placebo lead-in, participants were randomized to receive 2 counterbalanced blocks of 3 i.v. infusions of scopolamine (4 μg/kg) and placebo in a double-blind manner. The primary and secondary outcomes were the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, respectively. Magnetoencephalography and plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations were obtained prior to and after each treatment phase.
Results
As assessed by both the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, scopolamine had no significant antidepressant or anxiolytic effects relative to placebo. No significant drug vs placebo effects were seen in magnetoencephalography gamma power or brain-derived neurotrophic factor plasma concentrations, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor changes did not correlate with change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score in response to scopolamine.
Conclusions
These results do not support the efficacy of scopolamine for more severe or refractory forms of depression. No pre- to post-infusion changes in plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor were detected, and magnetoencephalography gamma power changed only in the placebo lead-in, suggesting that these biomarker measures were not affected by scopolamine in this cohort. While difficult to interpret given the lack of antidepressant response, the findings suggest that the neurobiological effects of ketamine and scopolamine are at least partly distinct.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30184133
pii: 5089436
doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy051
pmc: PMC6313153
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antidepressive Agents 0
Biomarkers 0
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor 0
Ketamine 690G0D6V8H
BDNF protein, human 7171WSG8A2
Scopolamine DL48G20X8X

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00369915']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10-18

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : ZIA MH002927
Pays : United States

Références

J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 24;27(43):11496-500
pubmed: 17959792
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Feb;17(2):331-6
pubmed: 24103211
Biol Psychiatry. 1991 Jul 15;30(2):157-69
pubmed: 1655072
J Biol Chem. 2016 May 6;291(19):9872-81
pubmed: 27006395
Drug Discov Today. 2018 Feb;23(2):333-348
pubmed: 29154758
Mol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;16(4):407-18
pubmed: 20351719
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Nov;17(11):1895-904
pubmed: 24964190
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40
pubmed: 16390886
Physiol Behav. 1982 Feb;28(2):307-11
pubmed: 7079344
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;21(3):169-84
pubmed: 22865617
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 26;7:267
pubmed: 24431986
Biol Psychiatry. 1986 Jul;21(8-9):813-29
pubmed: 3015271
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;70(12):1662-6
pubmed: 19744406
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1105-14
pubmed: 25987642
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Apr;31(4):297-307
pubmed: 24353110
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;63(8):856-64
pubmed: 16894061
Mol Psychiatry. 2012 May;17(5):537-48
pubmed: 21468034
Psychol Med. 2016 May;46(7):1459-72
pubmed: 26867988
Psychiatry Res. 1999 Dec 13;89(1):1-20
pubmed: 10643873
Am J Med Genet. 2002 Jul 8;114(5):527-9
pubmed: 12116189
Psychiatry Res. 1983 Jul;9(3):191-200
pubmed: 6312479
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1243-52
pubmed: 16554526
Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Sep 1;13(17):1903-11
pubmed: 15229186
Psychosom Med. 1974 May-Jun;36(3):248-57
pubmed: 4829619
J Psychiatr Res. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(6):577-82
pubmed: 15458853
Science. 2010 Aug 20;329(5994):959-64
pubmed: 20724638
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
pubmed: 8812068
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 1;83(1):29-37
pubmed: 28751069
Lancet. 1972 Sep 23;2(7778):632-5
pubmed: 4116781
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2017 Feb;1:
pubmed: 28649673
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr 15;63(8):730-5
pubmed: 18022604
Neuroimage. 2013 Jun;73:176-90
pubmed: 23376789
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 15;73(12):1142-55
pubmed: 23374639
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;17(10):1671-81
pubmed: 24832766
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 1;67(5):432-8
pubmed: 20074703
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1981 Jul;1(4):186-92
pubmed: 7028800
Neuropsychopharmacology. 1992 Nov;7(3):197-204
pubmed: 1388644
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;142(6):738-40
pubmed: 4003595
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 15;74(10):742-9
pubmed: 23751205
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;63(10):1121-9
pubmed: 17015814
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 15;73(12):1156-63
pubmed: 23200525
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 01;176(10):1482-1491
pubmed: 27571438
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017;15(1):11-20
pubmed: 26955968
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Aug;25(8):1136-46
pubmed: 26123243
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;24(7):1040-1052
pubmed: 29487402

Auteurs

Lawrence Park (L)

Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Maura Furey (M)

Janssen Research and Development, LLC, La Jolla, California.

Allison C Nugent (AC)

Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Cristan Farmer (C)

Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Jessica Ellis (J)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Joanna Szczepanik (J)

Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Marc S Lener (MS)

Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Carlos A Zarate (CA)

Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH