Mucosal advancement flap for recurrent complex anal fistula: a repeatable procedure.
Anal fistula
Cryptoglandular fistula
Fistula repair
Mucosal advancement flap
Surgery for anal fistula
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
accepted:
27
08
2018
pubmed:
7
9
2018
medline:
16
4
2019
entrez:
7
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) is the best option for complex anal fistula (AF) treatment. Recurrence is not rare and the best surgical option for his handling is a challenge considering the incontinence risk and the healing rate. We aimed to determine the feasibility and outcomes of a second MAF for recurrent complex AF previously treated with mucosal advancement flap. We retrospectively identified 32 patients undergoing two or more MAF for recurrent AF in a larger cohort of 121 consecutive cases of MAF operated by the same senior colorectal surgeon. Only complex AF of cryptoglandular origin was enrolled. A long-term follow-up was performed collecting clinical and functional data. Among 121 patients (group A) treated with mucosal advancement flap, 32 (26.4%) (group B) recurred with a complex AF requiring a second mucosal advancement flap procedure. Success rate of group B is 78.1%. Six patients of group B recurred a second time, another MAF was performed with healing in all cases. Complication rate (Clavien Dindo 3b) of group B is 9.4% compared to 8.3% of group A. A slight continence deficit (Miller score 1, 2, and 4) was detected after the first MAF in 3 patients. The Miller score for these patients did not change after the subsequent MAF. MAF is effective for treatment of complex recurrent AF. A pre-existing MAF procedure does not worsen the healing rate of the second flap. The rate of surgical complications is similar with those reported in the literature for MAFs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30187157
doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3155-y
pii: 10.1007/s00384-018-3155-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
197-200Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Nov;42(11):1419-22; discussion 1422-3
pubmed: 10566529
Br J Surg. 2000 Dec;87(12):1680-3
pubmed: 11122184
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Dec;45(12):1616-21
pubmed: 12473884
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Mar;22(3):259-64
pubmed: 16896993
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1508-11
pubmed: 17701070
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov;23(11):1023-31
pubmed: 18629515
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jan;52(1):18-22
pubmed: 19273951
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1465-74
pubmed: 22067173
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 May;30(5):613-9
pubmed: 25612521
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;17(7):619-26
pubmed: 25641401
Br J Surg. 1988 Feb;75(2):101-5
pubmed: 3349291
Br J Surg. 1987 May;74(5):390-1
pubmed: 3594132