Denosumab is effective toward glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis patients complicated with rheumatic diseases regardless of prior anti-osteoporotic drugs.
Aged
Alkaline Phosphatase
/ blood
Biomarkers
/ metabolism
Bone Density
/ drug effects
Bone Density Conservation Agents
/ adverse effects
Bone Remodeling
/ drug effects
Denosumab
/ adverse effects
Diphosphonates
/ pharmacology
Female
Glucocorticoids
/ adverse effects
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Osteoporosis
/ blood
Osteoporotic Fractures
/ epidemiology
Peptide Fragments
/ blood
Procollagen
/ blood
Regression Analysis
Rheumatic Diseases
/ complications
Treatment Outcome
Bisphosphonate
Bone turnover markers
Denosumab
Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis
Rheumatic disease
Teriparatide
Journal
Journal of bone and mineral metabolism
ISSN: 1435-5604
Titre abrégé: J Bone Miner Metab
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9436705
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
07
06
2018
accepted:
22
08
2018
pubmed:
7
9
2018
medline:
22
6
2019
entrez:
7
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We examined the efficacy and safety of denosumab as treatment for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) patients complicated with rheumatic diseases, by measuring patients' lumber bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. A total of 66 consecutive patients for whom denosumab was initiated between July 2013 and August 2016 were enrolled and evaluated for 12 months. All of the patients were treated with glucocorticoids for underlying rheumatic diseases. The clinical assessment included measurements of the BMD of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry technique and the bone turnover markers N-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (NTX) in urine, serum intact procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after the start of denosumab treatment. Adverse events (AEs) until 12 months were also analyzed. The mean percentage changes in BMD from baseline to 6 and 12 months were significant (2.85% increase, p < 0.0001 and 4.40% increase, p < 0.0001, respectively) regardless of the prior anti-osteoporotic drugs treatment (16 no transition from anti-osteoporotic drugs, 27 transition from bisphosphonate, 23 transition from teriparatide). The decreases in NTX, P1NP and BAP at 6 and 12 months were also significant. No serious AEs were noted. A multivariable logistic analysis showed that the prednisolone dose at baseline was associated with the clinical response to denosumab. In a real-world setting, denosumab was effective and safe for treating GIOP patients complicated with rheumatic diseases regardless of prior anti-osteoporotic drug treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30187273
doi: 10.1007/s00774-018-0955-7
pii: 10.1007/s00774-018-0955-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Diphosphonates
0
Glucocorticoids
0
Peptide Fragments
0
Procollagen
0
procollagen Type I N-terminal peptide
0
Denosumab
4EQZ6YO2HI
Alkaline Phosphatase
EC 3.1.3.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
554-562Références
J Nucl Med. 2000 Dec;41(12):2015-25
pubmed: 11138687
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Apr;15(4):323-8
pubmed: 14762652
Endocr J. 2006 Feb;53(1):27-34
pubmed: 16543669
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jun;93(6):2149-57
pubmed: 18381571
J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-61
pubmed: 18767928
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65
pubmed: 19671655
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):745-55
pubmed: 19671656
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;41(2):178-86
pubmed: 21616520
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 7;365(1):62-70
pubmed: 21732837
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Jan;23(1):317-26
pubmed: 21927922
J Clin Densitom. 2013 Apr-Jun;16(2):147-53
pubmed: 22521543
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Sep;97(9):3161-9
pubmed: 22723310
Bone Miner. 1990 Jan;8(1):39-51
pubmed: 2306553
Lancet. 2013 Jul 6;382(9886):50-6
pubmed: 23683600
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2013 Jun;5(3):107-11
pubmed: 23858334
J Bone Miner Metab. 2014 Jul;32(4):337-50
pubmed: 24818875
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Feb;26(2):765-74
pubmed: 25403903
Bone. 2015 Jun;75:222-8
pubmed: 25761434
Lancet. 2015 Sep 19;386(9999):1147-55
pubmed: 26144908
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Dec;26(12):2773-83
pubmed: 26202488
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Aug;50(8):616-24
pubmed: 27179251
Horm Metab Res. 2016 Nov;48(11):755-763
pubmed: 27871116
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):44
pubmed: 28425086
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;69(8):1095-1110
pubmed: 28585410
Bone Res. 2017 Jun 13;5:16055
pubmed: 28690911
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 15;114(33):8722-8727
pubmed: 28760963
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Jun;6(6):445-454
pubmed: 29631782
J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Sep;8(9):1137-48
pubmed: 8237484
J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Jun;11(6):707-30
pubmed: 8725168