Survival after Endoscopic Valve Therapy in Patients with Severe Emphysema.


Journal

Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases
ISSN: 1423-0356
Titre abrégé: Respiration
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 11 06 2018
accepted: 16 07 2018
pubmed: 19 9 2018
medline: 2 4 2020
entrez: 19 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Endoscopic valve therapy leads to an improvement of lung function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in a selected cohort of patients with advanced emphysema. So far, only few data exist on the long-term outcome. This analysis evaluated the impact of valve therapy on the survival of emphysema patients. Survival rates of emphysema patients who underwent valve therapy were assessed according to their radiological outcome following valve placement. From 2005 to 2013, 449 emphysema patients (mean age 64 ± 7 years) underwent valve therapy and were followed for a mean time of 37.3 ± 21.3 months. A total of 128 patients (29%) developed complete lobar atelectasis, 34 out of these also experienced a pneumothorax; 50 patients (11%) developed pneumothorax without lobar atelectasis, and 261 patients (58%) target lobe volume reduction or no volume change. Patients with atelectasis showed significantly better baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%), residual volume (L), total lung capacity (L), and transfer factor for carbon monoxide (%; all p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the BODE score (p = 0.195). Patients with valve-induced lobar atelectasis had a significant survival benefit compared to patients without atelectasis (p = 0.009; 5-year survival rate 65.3 vs. 43.9%). The advent of pneumothorax in 84 patients did not influence survival (p = 0.52). Lobar atelectasis following endoscopic valve therapy is associated with a survival benefit.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Endoscopic valve therapy leads to an improvement of lung function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in a selected cohort of patients with advanced emphysema. So far, only few data exist on the long-term outcome.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This analysis evaluated the impact of valve therapy on the survival of emphysema patients.
METHODS METHODS
Survival rates of emphysema patients who underwent valve therapy were assessed according to their radiological outcome following valve placement.
RESULTS RESULTS
From 2005 to 2013, 449 emphysema patients (mean age 64 ± 7 years) underwent valve therapy and were followed for a mean time of 37.3 ± 21.3 months. A total of 128 patients (29%) developed complete lobar atelectasis, 34 out of these also experienced a pneumothorax; 50 patients (11%) developed pneumothorax without lobar atelectasis, and 261 patients (58%) target lobe volume reduction or no volume change. Patients with atelectasis showed significantly better baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%), residual volume (L), total lung capacity (L), and transfer factor for carbon monoxide (%; all p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the BODE score (p = 0.195). Patients with valve-induced lobar atelectasis had a significant survival benefit compared to patients without atelectasis (p = 0.009; 5-year survival rate 65.3 vs. 43.9%). The advent of pneumothorax in 84 patients did not influence survival (p = 0.52).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Lobar atelectasis following endoscopic valve therapy is associated with a survival benefit.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30227420
pii: 000492274
doi: 10.1159/000492274
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

145-152

Informations de copyright

© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Daniela Gompelmann (D)

Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germanydaniela.gompelmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRCH), German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germanydaniela.gompelmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Nicola Benjamin (N)

Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Elena Bischoff (E)

Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Konstantina Kontogianni (K)

Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRCH), German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.

Maren Schuhmann (M)

Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Hans Hoffmann (H)

Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRCH), German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Claus Peter Heussel (CP)

Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRCH), German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Felix J F Herth (FJF)

Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRCH), German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.

Ralf Eberhardt (R)

Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRCH), German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH