Efficacy and Safety of Appetite-Stimulating Medications in the Inpatient Setting.


Journal

The Annals of pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 1542-6270
Titre abrégé: Ann Pharmacother
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203131

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 20 9 2018
medline: 28 2 2020
entrez: 20 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hospitalized patients are subject to acute illness and stress which may impact appetite or weight. Loss of appetite may lead to increased morbidity or mortality. Medications such as dronabinol, megestrol, and mirtazapine are used for weight gain in the outpatient setting; however, there is limited information about safety or effectiveness when initiated inpatient. To analyze the effectiveness and safety of appetite-stimulating medications in hospitalized patients. This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients initiated on dronabinol, megestrol, or mirtazapine for appetite. The primary outcome was change in meal intake between drug initiation and discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included documented improvement in appetite, change in weight and various laboratory parameters, and incidence of adverse effects. A total of 38 patients met inclusion criteria, and mirtazapine was most commonly used (42%). There was no significant difference between groups of appetite-stimulating medications with regard to mean change in meal intake, weight, albumin, or documented improvement in diet. Within groups, each agent showed numerical improvement in percentage meal intake, with a mean change from initiation to discontinuation of 17.12%. Almost half (48%) of the patients experienced improvement in diet after the start of medications. No serious adverse effects were observed. Conclusion and Relevance: In inpatients, there was no difference in change in meal intake or weight between dronabinol, megestrol, or mirtazapine, but they may show numerical improvements in meal intake. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the use of dronabinol, megestrol, and mirtazapine initiated in the inpatient setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hospitalized patients are subject to acute illness and stress which may impact appetite or weight. Loss of appetite may lead to increased morbidity or mortality. Medications such as dronabinol, megestrol, and mirtazapine are used for weight gain in the outpatient setting; however, there is limited information about safety or effectiveness when initiated inpatient.
OBJECTIVES
To analyze the effectiveness and safety of appetite-stimulating medications in hospitalized patients.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients initiated on dronabinol, megestrol, or mirtazapine for appetite. The primary outcome was change in meal intake between drug initiation and discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included documented improvement in appetite, change in weight and various laboratory parameters, and incidence of adverse effects.
RESULTS
A total of 38 patients met inclusion criteria, and mirtazapine was most commonly used (42%). There was no significant difference between groups of appetite-stimulating medications with regard to mean change in meal intake, weight, albumin, or documented improvement in diet. Within groups, each agent showed numerical improvement in percentage meal intake, with a mean change from initiation to discontinuation of 17.12%. Almost half (48%) of the patients experienced improvement in diet after the start of medications. No serious adverse effects were observed. Conclusion and Relevance: In inpatients, there was no difference in change in meal intake or weight between dronabinol, megestrol, or mirtazapine, but they may show numerical improvements in meal intake. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the use of dronabinol, megestrol, and mirtazapine initiated in the inpatient setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30229678
doi: 10.1177/1060028018802816
doi:

Substances chimiques

Appetite Stimulants 0
Dronabinol 7J8897W37S
Mirtazapine A051Q2099Q
Megestrol EA6LD1M70M

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

261-267

Auteurs

Meredith L Howard (ML)

1 University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
2 Medical City Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Roya Hossaini (R)

1 University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Catherine Tolar (C)

1 University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Marian L Gaviola (ML)

1 University of North Texas System College of Pharmacy, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
2 Medical City Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH