Chemotherapy and biologic use in the routine management of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: is clinical practice following the evidence?
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Australia
/ epidemiology
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Biological Products
/ therapeutic use
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Fluorouracil
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Leucovorin
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Organoplatinum Compounds
/ therapeutic use
Registries
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
bevacizumab
cetuximab
metastatic colorectal cancer
panitumumab
real-world outcomes
Journal
Internal medicine journal
ISSN: 1445-5994
Titre abrégé: Intern Med J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101092952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
03
07
2018
revised:
28
08
2018
accepted:
30
08
2018
pubmed:
20
9
2018
medline:
9
1
2020
entrez:
20
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Emerging evidence on the optimal use of chemotherapy and biologics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer should impact management in routine care. Recent studies have demonstrated benefits for initial triplet chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, FOLFOXIRI) and for initial treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) in patients with a RAS wild-type tumour and a left-sided primary tumour. To explore evolving pattern of metastatic colorectal cancer care over time in Australia. We analysed data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry. From July 2009 to December 2017, 2552 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were entered into the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry. Of 1585 patients who initially underwent chemotherapy, treatment was with a doublet in 76%. FOLFOXIRI was given to 22 patients (1.4%), mostly young patients and those with potentially resectable disease. Along with first-line chemotherapy, 61% received bevacizumab, while 3.3% received an EGFRi, predominantly over the last 2 years. Within the KRAS wild-type left-sided tumour cohort, EGFRi use increased from 9% in 2015 to 37% in 2017. Across treatment sites, there was a wide variation in the utilisation of FOLFOXIRI and EGFRi therapy; bevacizumab use was more consistent. A clear impact on survival outcomes from these regimens is not evident, potentially due to multiple confounders. Doublet chemotherapy + bevacizumab remains the dominant initial strategy, with limited uptake of triplet chemotherapy and of EGFRi. Potential explanations include uncertainty about the significance of post hoc analyses for EGFRi and concerns regarding adverse events for both strategies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Emerging evidence on the optimal use of chemotherapy and biologics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer should impact management in routine care. Recent studies have demonstrated benefits for initial triplet chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, FOLFOXIRI) and for initial treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) in patients with a RAS wild-type tumour and a left-sided primary tumour.
AIM
To explore evolving pattern of metastatic colorectal cancer care over time in Australia.
METHODS
We analysed data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry.
RESULTS
From July 2009 to December 2017, 2552 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were entered into the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry. Of 1585 patients who initially underwent chemotherapy, treatment was with a doublet in 76%. FOLFOXIRI was given to 22 patients (1.4%), mostly young patients and those with potentially resectable disease. Along with first-line chemotherapy, 61% received bevacizumab, while 3.3% received an EGFRi, predominantly over the last 2 years. Within the KRAS wild-type left-sided tumour cohort, EGFRi use increased from 9% in 2015 to 37% in 2017. Across treatment sites, there was a wide variation in the utilisation of FOLFOXIRI and EGFRi therapy; bevacizumab use was more consistent. A clear impact on survival outcomes from these regimens is not evident, potentially due to multiple confounders.
CONCLUSION
Doublet chemotherapy + bevacizumab remains the dominant initial strategy, with limited uptake of triplet chemotherapy and of EGFRi. Potential explanations include uncertainty about the significance of post hoc analyses for EGFRi and concerns regarding adverse events for both strategies.
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Biological Products
0
Organoplatinum Compounds
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
446-454Subventions
Organisme : Roche Products Pty Limited (Australia)
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.