Patient-Initiated Telephone Calls in the Postoperative Period After Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.
Journal
Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 2154-4212
Titre abrégé: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
25
9
2018
medline:
16
11
2021
entrez:
25
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate reasons and factors associated with patient calls in the postoperative period after female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. A retrospective review using electronic medical records was performed on consecutive patients who underwent surgery within our academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice during a 6-month period. Calls after postoperative discharge until first scheduled postoperative visit were included. Reasons and number of calls were tabulated. Clinical and surgical factors were extracted. Continuous data were evaluated with a Student t test or analysis of variance; categorical data were evaluated with a χ test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. During the designated period, 302 patients underwent surgery, and 173 (57.3%) patients made 345 calls (mean ± SD, 2.0 ± 1.5 calls). Reasons were categorized under 6 distinct domains: bowel, pain, activity, medication regimen, urinary, and bleeding. The most frequent concern within each domain was constipation (11.6%), abdominal pain (6.4%), physical activity (8.7%), pain regimen (14.5%), urinary catheter related (13.3%), and vaginal bleeding (12.1%), respectively. A greater number of phone calls were recorded among patients discharged home with catheters (P = 0.015), and patients who underwent posterior colporrhaphy (P = 0.005) and retropubic urethropexy (P = 0.014). Patients discharged with home nursing (11, 6.4%) demonstrated a significantly higher number of phone calls (3.8 ± 2.5, P < 0.001). Evaluations were required for 37% of callers. Twelve patients were seen in the emergency department, of whom 3 (1.7%) were readmitted to the hospital. Postoperative patient-initiated telephone calls after pelvic reconstructive surgery are common. Bowel-, urinary-, and medication-based phone calls account for the highest frequency and volume.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30247168
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000636
pii: 01436319-202010000-00008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
626-629Références
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21th century. Iom 2001;1–8.
Musgrove P, Creese A, Preker A, et al. Health systems: improving perfomance. World Heal Organ 2000.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Roadmap for implementing value driven healthcare in the traditional Medicare fee-for-service program. 2010;1–31.
Kenton KS. What impacts patient satisfaction with reconstructive pelvic surgery?Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217(2):108–109.
Vorhies JS, Weaver MJ, Bishop JA. Admission through the emergency department is an independent risk factor for lower satisfaction with physician performance among orthopaedic surgery patients: a multicenter study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24(10):735–742.
Levin JM, Winkelman RD, Smith GA, et al. Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. Spine J 2018;18:226–233.
Hadeed MM, Kandil A, Patel V, et al. Factors associated with patient-initiated telephone calls after orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31(3):e96–e100.
Reid R, Puvanesarajah V, Kandil A, et al. Factors associated with patient-initiated telephone calls after spine surgery. World Neurosurg 2017;98:625–631.
Schimpf MO, Steinberg AC, Tulikangas PK, et al. Patterns of telephone calls triaged by registered nurses in a urogynecology practice. Urol Nurs 2008;28(3):213–216.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40(5):373–383.
Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, et al. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194(3):722–728.
Kenton K, Pham T, Mueller E, et al. Patient preparedness: an important predictor of surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:654.e1–654.e6.
Mahnert N, Kamdar N, Lim CS, et al. Risk factors for emergency department visits after hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130(2):296–304.
Kummerow Broman K, Oyefule OO, Phillips SE, et al. Postoperative care using a secure online patient portal: changing the (inter) face of general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2015;221(6):1057–1066.