Next-Generation Robotic Spine Surgery: First Report on Feasibility, Safety, and Learning Curve.


Journal

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 2332-4260
Titre abrégé: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635417

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 07 2019
Historique:
received: 01 03 2018
accepted: 20 08 2018
pubmed: 25 9 2018
medline: 24 9 2020
entrez: 25 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pedicle screw placement is a commonly performed procedure. Robot-guided screw placement is a recent technological advance that has shown accuracy and reliability with first-generation platforms. To report our initial experience with the safety, feasibility, and learning curve associated with pedicle screw placement utilizing next-generation robotic guidance. A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain data for 20 patients who underwent lumbar pedicle screw placement under robotic guidance after undergoing interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stabilization for degenerative disc disease with or without spondylolisthesis. The newest generation Mazor X (Mazor Robotics Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) was used. Accuracy of screw placement was determined to be grade I to IV. Grade I was in the pedicle (no breach/deviation), grade II was breach < 2 mm, grade III was breach 2 to 4 mm, and grade IV was breach >4 mm; breach direction (superior, lateral, inferior, or medial) was also recorded. Twenty patients underwent robotically assisted pedicle screw placement of 75 screws at 24 levels. Seventy-four screw placements (98.7%) were grade I; 1 (1.3%) was grade II (medial). No complications occurred. Mean time for screw insertion was 3.6 min. Mean fluoroscopy time was 13.1 s and mean radiation dose was 29.9 mGy. We found that next-generation robotic spine surgery was safe and feasible with reliable and precise accuracy and a minimal learning curve. As this technology improves, further novel applications are expected to develop. Further research is needed to determine long-term efficacy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Pedicle screw placement is a commonly performed procedure. Robot-guided screw placement is a recent technological advance that has shown accuracy and reliability with first-generation platforms.
OBJECTIVE
To report our initial experience with the safety, feasibility, and learning curve associated with pedicle screw placement utilizing next-generation robotic guidance.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain data for 20 patients who underwent lumbar pedicle screw placement under robotic guidance after undergoing interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stabilization for degenerative disc disease with or without spondylolisthesis. The newest generation Mazor X (Mazor Robotics Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) was used. Accuracy of screw placement was determined to be grade I to IV. Grade I was in the pedicle (no breach/deviation), grade II was breach < 2 mm, grade III was breach 2 to 4 mm, and grade IV was breach >4 mm; breach direction (superior, lateral, inferior, or medial) was also recorded.
RESULTS
Twenty patients underwent robotically assisted pedicle screw placement of 75 screws at 24 levels. Seventy-four screw placements (98.7%) were grade I; 1 (1.3%) was grade II (medial). No complications occurred. Mean time for screw insertion was 3.6 min. Mean fluoroscopy time was 13.1 s and mean radiation dose was 29.9 mGy.
CONCLUSION
We found that next-generation robotic spine surgery was safe and feasible with reliable and precise accuracy and a minimal learning curve. As this technology improves, further novel applications are expected to develop. Further research is needed to determine long-term efficacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30247684
pii: 5106136
doi: 10.1093/ons/opy280
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

61-69

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Auteurs

Asham Khan (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health; Buffalo, New York.

Joshua E Meyers (JE)

Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health; Buffalo, New York.

Ioannis Siasios (I)

Department of Neurosurgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

John Pollina (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health; Buffalo, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH