Association between treatment facility volume, therapy types and overall survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.


Journal

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
ISSN: 1477-2574
Titre abrégé: HPB (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100900921

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 09 02 2018
revised: 05 07 2018
accepted: 01 08 2018
pubmed: 30 9 2018
medline: 4 4 2020
entrez: 30 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine the association between the number of patients with intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) treated annually at a treatment facility (volume) and overall survival (outcome). Patients with IHCC reported to the National Cancer Database (years 2004-2015) were included. We classified facilities by tertiles (T; mean IHCC patients treated/year): T1: <2.56; T2: 2.57-5.39 and T3: ≥5.40. Volume-outcome relationship was determined by using Cox regression adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, insurance type and therapy received. There were 11,344 IHCC patients treated at 1106 facilities. On multivariable analysis, facility volume was independently associated with all-cause mortality (p < 0.001). The unadjusted median OS by facility volume was: T1: 5 months (m), T2: 8.1 m, and T3: 13.1 m (p < 0.001). Compared with patients treated at T3 facilities, patients treated at lower-tertile facilities had significantly higher risk of death [T2 hazard ratio (HR), 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]; T1 HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.33]. Patients treated at high-volume centers were more likely to get surgery (34.6 vs 13.1%) and adjuvant therapy. IHCC patients treated at high-volume facilities had a significant improvement in OS and were more likely to receive surgery and adjuvant therapy as compared to that of patients at low-volume facilities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To determine the association between the number of patients with intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) treated annually at a treatment facility (volume) and overall survival (outcome).
METHODS
Patients with IHCC reported to the National Cancer Database (years 2004-2015) were included. We classified facilities by tertiles (T; mean IHCC patients treated/year): T1: <2.56; T2: 2.57-5.39 and T3: ≥5.40. Volume-outcome relationship was determined by using Cox regression adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, insurance type and therapy received.
RESULTS
There were 11,344 IHCC patients treated at 1106 facilities. On multivariable analysis, facility volume was independently associated with all-cause mortality (p < 0.001). The unadjusted median OS by facility volume was: T1: 5 months (m), T2: 8.1 m, and T3: 13.1 m (p < 0.001). Compared with patients treated at T3 facilities, patients treated at lower-tertile facilities had significantly higher risk of death [T2 hazard ratio (HR), 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]; T1 HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.33]. Patients treated at high-volume centers were more likely to get surgery (34.6 vs 13.1%) and adjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSION
IHCC patients treated at high-volume facilities had a significant improvement in OS and were more likely to receive surgery and adjuvant therapy as compared to that of patients at low-volume facilities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30266490
pii: S1365-182X(18)33933-9
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

379-386

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Anuhya Kommalapati (A)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.

Sri Harsha Tella (SH)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.

Gaurav Goyal (G)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Mitesh Borad (M)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Steven R Alberts (SR)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Lewis Roberts (L)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Joleen M Hubbard (JM)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Lori Durgin (L)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Sean Cleary (S)

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Amit Mahipal (A)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: mahipal.amit@mayo.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH