Clinical outcomes of patients with G1/G2 neuroendocrine tumors arising from foregut or hindgut treated with somatostatin analogs: a retrospective study.
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bone Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Neuroendocrine Tumors
/ drug therapy
Octreotide
/ administration & dosage
Peptides, Cyclic
/ administration & dosage
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Somatostatin
/ administration & dosage
Survival Rate
Foregut NET
Hindgut NET
Lanreotide
Neuroendocrine tumor
Octoreotide
Somatostatin analog
Journal
Investigational new drugs
ISSN: 1573-0646
Titre abrégé: Invest New Drugs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309330
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
24
08
2018
accepted:
20
09
2018
pubmed:
30
9
2018
medline:
23
2
2020
entrez:
30
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare tumors for which somatostatin analogs (SSA) are used not only for symptom control due to a functioning tumor, but also for the disease control of unresectable NET. The efficacy of SSA for midgut NET has been verified by previous studies, but insufficient evidence exists for SSA treatment of NET in the foregut and hindgut (F/H-NET). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of SSA for unresectable F/H-NET. Patients with unresectable F/H-NET treated with SSA between February 2011 and August 2017 at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters of efficacy were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events. Twelve cases with unresectable F/H-NET were extracted from our database. With a median follow-up time of 25.9 months, the median PFS was 13.6 months. Two- and 3-year survival rates were 87.5 and 62.5%, respectively. The ORR was 8.3%, and the disease control rate was 75%. Serious adverse events were not observed. Subgroup analysis, including G1/G2, and hepatic tumor load, which is the volume of NET liver metastases, did not reveal a difference in PFS. The efficacy and safety of SSA for F/H-NET seemed similar to that found in the PROMID study, highlighting its relevance for the treatment of this disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30267338
doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0669-7
pii: 10.1007/s10637-018-0669-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Peptides, Cyclic
0
lanreotide
0G3DE8943Y
Somatostatin
51110-01-1
Octreotide
RWM8CCW8GP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
573-578Références
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):3063-72
pubmed: 18565894
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1335-1342
pubmed: 28448665
Invest New Drugs. 2017 Aug;35(4):499-508
pubmed: 28470558
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):769
pubmed: 29145818
J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;50(1):58-64
pubmed: 24499825
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(19):e3534
pubmed: 27175651
Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(2):119-24
pubmed: 26784901
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4656-63
pubmed: 19704057
Neuroendocrinology. 2018;106(3):211-220
pubmed: 28554173
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 10;26(26):4311-8
pubmed: 18779618
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):224-33
pubmed: 25014687
Diagn Pathol. 2016 Nov 8;11(1):128
pubmed: 27821179