Characteristics and Outcomes of BI-RADS 3 Lesions on Breast MRI.


Journal

Clinical breast cancer
ISSN: 1938-0666
Titre abrégé: Clin Breast Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898731

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 29 06 2018
revised: 27 08 2018
accepted: 28 08 2018
pubmed: 1 10 2018
medline: 27 3 2020
entrez: 1 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There are few data regarding the use and outcomes of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 assessment on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to describe the imaging findings prompting a BI-RADS 3 assessment and to report their outcomes, including the timing of follow-up examinations. We performed a retrospective study evaluating 199 breast lesions in 186 patients who were assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment on breast MRI over a 5-year period. Clinical and imaging features were recorded. For outcomes analysis, lesions were considered benign if they showed 2 years of MRI stability, if they were declared benign during follow-up, or if the patient underwent biopsy with benign pathology results. Clinical and imaging features of BI-RADS 3 lesions associated with malignancy were assessed by the Fisher exact test, with P < .05 considered significant. Of the 199 breast MRI lesions assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 80 (40%) of 199 were non-mass enhancement, 61 (31%) were a single focus, and 58 (29%) were masses. A total of 131 lesions (66%) were eligible for outcome analysis after excluding those lost to follow-up; 4 (3%) were diagnosed as malignant within the 2-year follow-up. Masses assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment were more likely to be malignant during follow-up than non-mass enhancement or single focus (P < .05). Despite limited data on the use of BI-RADS 3 at breast MRI, there is a low malignancy rate of 3% at our institution. Additional studies are needed to further define the appropriate use of BI-RADS 3 on breast MRI.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There are few data regarding the use and outcomes of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 assessment on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to describe the imaging findings prompting a BI-RADS 3 assessment and to report their outcomes, including the timing of follow-up examinations.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We performed a retrospective study evaluating 199 breast lesions in 186 patients who were assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment on breast MRI over a 5-year period. Clinical and imaging features were recorded. For outcomes analysis, lesions were considered benign if they showed 2 years of MRI stability, if they were declared benign during follow-up, or if the patient underwent biopsy with benign pathology results. Clinical and imaging features of BI-RADS 3 lesions associated with malignancy were assessed by the Fisher exact test, with P < .05 considered significant.
RESULTS
Of the 199 breast MRI lesions assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment, 80 (40%) of 199 were non-mass enhancement, 61 (31%) were a single focus, and 58 (29%) were masses. A total of 131 lesions (66%) were eligible for outcome analysis after excluding those lost to follow-up; 4 (3%) were diagnosed as malignant within the 2-year follow-up. Masses assigned a BI-RADS 3 assessment were more likely to be malignant during follow-up than non-mass enhancement or single focus (P < .05).
CONCLUSION
Despite limited data on the use of BI-RADS 3 at breast MRI, there is a low malignancy rate of 3% at our institution. Additional studies are needed to further define the appropriate use of BI-RADS 3 on breast MRI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30268764
pii: S1526-8209(18)30455-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.08.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e152-e159

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Babita Panigrahi (B)

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Susan C Harvey (SC)

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Lisa A Mullen (LA)

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Eniola Falomo (E)

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Philip Di Carlo (P)

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Bonmyong Lee (B)

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Kelly S Myers (KS)

Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: kmyers25@jhmi.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH