Aquablation of the prostate: single-center results of a non-selected, consecutive patient cohort.
Ablation Techniques
/ methods
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prostatic Hyperplasia
/ complications
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
/ epidemiology
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Urethral Obstruction
/ etiology
Water
AquaBeam
Aquablation
BPH
BPO
Waterjet
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
03
09
2018
accepted:
24
09
2018
pubmed:
6
10
2018
medline:
17
1
2020
entrez:
6
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aquablation of the prostate using the AquaBeam™ system promises equivalent functional outcomes, reduced learning curve, and improved sexual function compared to transurethral prostate resection as shown in prospective randomized trials. This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate if published results can be transferred into the clinical routine in a non-selected patient collective. This study includes all patients treated between September 2017 and June 2018 with Aquablation of the prostate. Patients have been evaluated prospectively for the perioperative course and early follow-up. Besides voiding parameter and symptom score, TRUS-volume change, ejaculatory function, and adverse events have been recorded. 118 consecutive patients have been treated in the given time. Aquablation could be carried out successfully in all patients. IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR improved significantly after the procedure and continued to improve during 3-month follow-up. Mean OR time was 20 min, TRUS volume decreased by 65%, and 73% of the patients retained antegrade ejaculation. Thirteen adverse events (> Clavien-Dindo I) occurred in 10 patients. The surgical ablation of the prostate using Aquablation achieved significant and immediate improvement of functional voiding parameters Qmax and PVR as well as symptomatic improvement of IPSS and QoL. Aquablation seems to be safe and effective with a low perioperative complication profile even in a non-selected group of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30288598
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2509-y
pii: 10.1007/s00345-018-2509-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1369-1375Références
BJU Int. 1999 Mar;83(4):410-5
pubmed: 10210562
J Endourol. 2000 Aug;14(6):501-5
pubmed: 10954307
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2000 Sep;45(9):222-7
pubmed: 11030091
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 May;29(4):407-14
pubmed: 12711300
Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):569-73
pubmed: 16704894
HPB (Oxford). 2008;10(4):275-80
pubmed: 18773110
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2009 Sep;61(3):309-24
pubmed: 19773731
World J Urol. 2011 Aug;29(4):423-7
pubmed: 21305303
J Endourol. 2011 Oct;25(10):1599-603
pubmed: 21815824
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096
pubmed: 24972732
J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):63-9
pubmed: 25000418
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):923-9
pubmed: 26477826
World J Urol. 2016 Sep;34(9):1207-19
pubmed: 26699627
Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;43(3):377-84
pubmed: 27476130
World J Urol. 2016 Oct;34(10):1353-5
pubmed: 27585786
Urologe A. 2016 Nov;55(11):1446-1454
pubmed: 27714414
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1565-1572
pubmed: 28111300
Asian J Urol. 2017 Jul;4(3):148-151
pubmed: 29264223
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):945-951
pubmed: 29319914
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1252-1261
pubmed: 29360529
BJU Int. 2019 Apr;123(4):651-660
pubmed: 29862630
Can J Urol. 2018 Jun;25(3):9317-9322
pubmed: 29900819
Br J Urol. 1996 Mar;77(3):398-400
pubmed: 8814845