Naftazone in advanced Parkinson's disease: An acute L-DOPA challenge randomized controlled trial.
Aged
Antiparkinson Agents
/ administration & dosage
Cross-Over Studies
Dopamine Agents
/ adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Levodopa
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Naphthoquinones
/ administration & dosage
Parkinson Disease
/ drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
Clinical trial
Levodopa-induced dyskinesia
Naftazone
Parkinson's disease
Journal
Parkinsonism & related disorders
ISSN: 1873-5126
Titre abrégé: Parkinsonism Relat Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9513583
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
11
07
2018
revised:
27
09
2018
accepted:
01
10
2018
pubmed:
10
10
2018
medline:
6
5
2020
entrez:
10
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is an unmet need to better control motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD). Naftazone, which exhibits glutamate release inhibition properties, has shown antiparkinsonian and antidyskinetic activity in preclinical models of PD and in a clinical proof of concept study. We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial in PD patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia testing naftazone 160 mg/day versus placebo for 14 days. The two co-primary endpoints were the area under curve (AUC) of motor (MDS-UPDRS part III) and dyskinesia (AIMS) scores during an acute levodopa challenge performed at the end of each period. Secondary endpoints were UDysRS and axial symptoms scores during the challenge; AIMS, UDysRS, and time spent with or without dyskinesia the day before the challenge. The primary analysis was performed in the per protocol population. Sixteen patients were included in the analysis. There was no difference between naftazone and placebo for the AUC of MDS-UPDRS III (-89, 95%CI[-1071; 893], p = 0.85), and AIMS (70, 95%CI[-192; 332], p = 0.57). At the end of treatment periods, AIMS score tended to be lower with naftazone than placebo (4.4 ± 3.4 versus 6.7 ± 4.4, p = 0.07), but UDysRS scores and other secondary outcomes were not different. Naftazone was safe and well tolerated. This study did not confirm previous results on the efficacy of naftazone on dyskinesia nor motor fluctuations highlighting the problem of translating results obtained in preclinical models into clinical trials. Further investigation of naftazone may be conducted in PD with longer treatment duration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30297210
pii: S1353-8020(18)30431-0
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.10.005
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiparkinson Agents
0
Dopamine Agents
0
Naphthoquinones
0
naftazone
15B0523P5L
Levodopa
46627O600J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
51-56Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.