Machine learning based automated dynamic quantification of left heart chamber volumes.
3D echocardiography
automation
cardiac chamber quantification
machine learning
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2019
01 May 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
accepted:
13
09
2018
pubmed:
12
10
2018
medline:
11
8
2020
entrez:
11
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies have demonstrated the ability of a new automated algorithm for volumetric analysis of 3D echocardiographic (3DE) datasets to provide accurate and reproducible measurements of left ventricular and left atrial (LV, LA) volumes at end-systole and end-diastole. Recently, this methodology was expanded using a machine learning (ML) approach to automatically measure chamber volumes throughout the cardiac cycle, resulting in LV and LA volume-time curves. We aimed to validate ejection and filling parameters obtained from these curves by comparing them to independent well-validated reference techniques. We studied 20 patients referred for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations, who underwent 3DE imaging the same day. Volume-time curves were obtained for both LV and LA chambers using the ML algorithm (Philips HeartModel), and independently conventional 3DE volumetric analysis (TomTec), and CMR images (slice-by-slice, frame-by-frame manual tracing). Automatically derived LV and LA volumes and ejection/filling parameters were compared against both reference techniques. Minor manual correction of the automatically detected LV and LA borders was needed in 4/20 and 5/20 cases, respectively. Time required to generate volume-time curves was 35 ± 17 s using ML algorithm, 3.6 ± 0.9 min using conventional 3DE analysis, and 96 ± 14 min using CMR. Volume-time curves obtained by all three techniques were similar in shape and magnitude. In both comparisons, ejection/filling parameters showed no significant inter-technique differences. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed small biases, despite wide limits of agreement. The automated ML algorithm can quickly measure dynamic LV and LA volumes and accurately analyse ejection/filling parameters. Incorporation of this algorithm into the clinical workflow may increase the utilization of 3DE imaging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30304500
pii: 5124328
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey137
pmc: PMC6933871
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
541-549Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007381
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2018. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jan;25(1):80-8
pubmed: 22000777
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;33(2):209-218
pubmed: 27696111
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1569-1579
pubmed: 29153577
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2001 Mar;2(1):31-9
pubmed: 11882423
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Dec;35(12):1953-62
pubmed: 19828226
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May;17(5):564-75
pubmed: 26160404
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Mar;10(1):23-32
pubmed: 28211015
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jun 01;18(6):670-680
pubmed: 27461212
Med Image Anal. 2012 Jul;16(5):933-51
pubmed: 22465077
Echocardiography. 2011 Jul;28(6):676-83
pubmed: 21718353
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Sep;25(9):978-85
pubmed: 22766029
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Jan;16(1):29-37
pubmed: 12514632
J Cardiol. 2015 Jul;66(1):50-6
pubmed: 25242299
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;9(7):769-782
pubmed: 27318718
Heart. 2017 Apr;103(7):481-482
pubmed: 27794016
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;5(8):769-77
pubmed: 22897989
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):115-24
pubmed: 24192452
Echocardiography. 2008 Oct;25(9):968-73
pubmed: 18771555
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Nov;110(11):580-589
pubmed: 28566200
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):47-58
pubmed: 28159984
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;29(2):285-93
pubmed: 22752362
Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 May;29(4):516-24
pubmed: 21216552
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Nov;30(11):1049-1058
pubmed: 28916243
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Sep;30(9):879-885
pubmed: 28688857
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018 Jan 23;16(1):2
pubmed: 29357888
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28(5):1073-85
pubmed: 21695484