Presence of Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer During Follow-Up and Prognosis.


Journal

Journal of the National Cancer Institute
ISSN: 1460-2105
Titre abrégé: J Natl Cancer Inst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503089

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2019
Historique:
received: 30 01 2018
revised: 23 04 2018
accepted: 03 08 2018
pubmed: 13 10 2018
medline: 12 3 2020
entrez: 13 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The prognostic relevance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) at the time of primary diagnosis has been well established. However, little information is available regarding their prognostic relevance to follow-up care. The multicenter, open-label, phase III SUCCESS A trial compared two adjuvant chemotherapy regimens followed by 2 vs 5 years of zoledronate for early-stage, high-risk breast cancer patients. The presence of CTCs was assessed before and 2 years after chemotherapy using the FDA-approved CellSearch System. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using univariate log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regressions. OS and DFS were measured starting from an assessment of CTCs 2 years after the completion of chemotherapy. All statistical tests were two-sided. The sample included 1087 patients who participated in the translational research program of the SUCCESS A trial and for whom sufficient translational data were available regarding CTC status at baseline and at the 2-year follow-up visit. Two years after chemotherapy, 198 (18.2%) patients were CTC-positive. The median follow-up after this timepoint was 37 months. Cox regressions that included CTC status at baseline revealed that CTC status 2 years after chemotherapy had statistically significant and independent prognostic relevance for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.04 to 7.52, P < .001) and DFS (HR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.50 to 3.55, P < .001). The presence of CTCs 2 years after chemotherapy was associated with decreased OS and DFS. Based on these results, active individualized surveillance strategies for breast cancer survivors based on biomarkers should be reconsidered.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The prognostic relevance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) at the time of primary diagnosis has been well established. However, little information is available regarding their prognostic relevance to follow-up care.
METHODS
The multicenter, open-label, phase III SUCCESS A trial compared two adjuvant chemotherapy regimens followed by 2 vs 5 years of zoledronate for early-stage, high-risk breast cancer patients. The presence of CTCs was assessed before and 2 years after chemotherapy using the FDA-approved CellSearch System. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using univariate log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regressions. OS and DFS were measured starting from an assessment of CTCs 2 years after the completion of chemotherapy. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS
The sample included 1087 patients who participated in the translational research program of the SUCCESS A trial and for whom sufficient translational data were available regarding CTC status at baseline and at the 2-year follow-up visit. Two years after chemotherapy, 198 (18.2%) patients were CTC-positive. The median follow-up after this timepoint was 37 months. Cox regressions that included CTC status at baseline revealed that CTC status 2 years after chemotherapy had statistically significant and independent prognostic relevance for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.04 to 7.52, P < .001) and DFS (HR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.50 to 3.55, P < .001).
CONCLUSION
The presence of CTCs 2 years after chemotherapy was associated with decreased OS and DFS. Based on these results, active individualized surveillance strategies for breast cancer survivors based on biomarkers should be reconsidered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30312434
pii: 5127124
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy152
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

380-387

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Elisabeth Trapp (E)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Wolfgang Janni (W)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Christian Schindlbeck (C)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center Traunstein, Traunstein, Germany.

Julia Jückstock (J)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Ulrich Andergassen (U)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Amelie de Gregorio (A)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni (M)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich Clinic and Policlinic for Radiology, Munich, Germany.

Marie Tzschaschel (M)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Arkadius Polasik (A)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Julian G Koch (JG)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Thomas W P Friedl (TWP)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Peter A Fasching (PA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Lothar Haeberle (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Tanja Fehm (T)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Andreas Schneeweiss (A)

National Center for Tumor Diseases, Ruprecht-Karls-University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Matthias W Beckmann (MW)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Klaus Pantel (K)

Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Volkmar Mueller (V)

Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Brigitte Rack (B)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Christoph Scholz (C)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH