Hemodynamic measurements with an abdominal 4D flow MRI sequence with spiral sampling and compressed sensing in patients with chronic liver disease.
Abdomen
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Aged
End Stage Liver Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Hemodynamics
Humans
Hypertension, Portal
/ diagnostic imaging
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Liver
/ blood supply
Liver Cirrhosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Reproducibility of Results
4D flow
cirrhosis
liver fibrosis
phase contrast MRI
portal hypertension
spiral
Journal
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
ISSN: 1522-2586
Titre abrégé: J Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9105850
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
23
05
2018
revised:
30
07
2018
accepted:
31
07
2018
pubmed:
16
10
2018
medline:
26
8
2020
entrez:
16
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The test-retest/interobserver repeatability and diagnostic value of 4D flow MRI in liver disease is underreported. To determine the reproducibility/repeatability of flow quantification in abdominal vessels using a spiral 4D flow MRI sequence; to assess the value of 4D flow parameters in diagnosing cirrhosis and degree of portal hypertension. Prospective. Fifty-two patients with chronic liver disease. 1.5T/spiral 4D flow acquired in one breath-hold. Thirteen abdominal vessels were identified and segmented by two independent observers to measure maximum and time-averaged through-plane velocity, net flow, and vessel cross-section area. Interobserver agreement and test-retest repeatability were evaluated in 15 and 4 cases, respectively. Prediction of the presence and severity of cirrhosis and portal hypertension was assessed using 4D flow parameters. Cohen's kappa coefficient, coefficient of variation (CV), Bland-Altman, Mann-Whitney tests, logistic regression. For all vessels combined, measurements showed acceptable agreement between observers, with Cohen's kappa = 0.70 (P < 0.001), CV < 21%, Bland-Altman bias <5%, but high limits of agreement ([-75%,75%]). Test-retest repeatability was excellent in large vessels (CV = 1-15%, bias = 1-25%, Bland-Altman limits of agreement [BALA] = [4%,150%]), and poor in small vessels (CV = 7-130%, bias = 10-200%, BALA = [8%,190%]). Average velocity in the right hepatic vein and average area of the splenic vein were higher in cirrhosis (P = 0.027/0.0039). Flow in the middle hepatic vein strongly correlated with Child-Pugh score (ρ = 0.84, P = 0.0238), while flow in the splenic vein (ρ = 0.43, P = 0.032), time-average (ρ = 0.46, P = 0.02) and peak velocity in the superior mesenteric vein (ρ = 0.45, P = 0.032), and peak velocity in the infrarenal IVC (ρ = 0.39, P = 0.032) positively correlated with an imaging-based portal hypertension score. Average area of the splenic vein predicted cirrhosis (P = 0.019; area under the curve AUC [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.87 [0.71,1.00]) and clinically significant portal hypertension (P = 0.042; AUC [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.57-0.99]). Spiral 4D flow allows comprehensive assessment of abdominal vessels in one breath-hold, with substantial interobserver reproducibility, but variable test-retest repeatability. 4D flow may potentially reflect vascular changes due to cirrhosis and portal hypertension. 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:994-1005.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The test-retest/interobserver repeatability and diagnostic value of 4D flow MRI in liver disease is underreported.
PURPOSE
To determine the reproducibility/repeatability of flow quantification in abdominal vessels using a spiral 4D flow MRI sequence; to assess the value of 4D flow parameters in diagnosing cirrhosis and degree of portal hypertension.
STUDY TYPE
Prospective.
SUBJECTS
Fifty-two patients with chronic liver disease.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE
1.5T/spiral 4D flow acquired in one breath-hold.
ASSESSMENT
Thirteen abdominal vessels were identified and segmented by two independent observers to measure maximum and time-averaged through-plane velocity, net flow, and vessel cross-section area. Interobserver agreement and test-retest repeatability were evaluated in 15 and 4 cases, respectively. Prediction of the presence and severity of cirrhosis and portal hypertension was assessed using 4D flow parameters.
STATISTICAL TESTS
Cohen's kappa coefficient, coefficient of variation (CV), Bland-Altman, Mann-Whitney tests, logistic regression.
RESULTS
For all vessels combined, measurements showed acceptable agreement between observers, with Cohen's kappa = 0.70 (P < 0.001), CV < 21%, Bland-Altman bias <5%, but high limits of agreement ([-75%,75%]). Test-retest repeatability was excellent in large vessels (CV = 1-15%, bias = 1-25%, Bland-Altman limits of agreement [BALA] = [4%,150%]), and poor in small vessels (CV = 7-130%, bias = 10-200%, BALA = [8%,190%]). Average velocity in the right hepatic vein and average area of the splenic vein were higher in cirrhosis (P = 0.027/0.0039). Flow in the middle hepatic vein strongly correlated with Child-Pugh score (ρ = 0.84, P = 0.0238), while flow in the splenic vein (ρ = 0.43, P = 0.032), time-average (ρ = 0.46, P = 0.02) and peak velocity in the superior mesenteric vein (ρ = 0.45, P = 0.032), and peak velocity in the infrarenal IVC (ρ = 0.39, P = 0.032) positively correlated with an imaging-based portal hypertension score. Average area of the splenic vein predicted cirrhosis (P = 0.019; area under the curve AUC [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.87 [0.71,1.00]) and clinically significant portal hypertension (P = 0.042; AUC [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.57-0.99]).
DATA CONCLUSION
Spiral 4D flow allows comprehensive assessment of abdominal vessels in one breath-hold, with substantial interobserver reproducibility, but variable test-retest repeatability. 4D flow may potentially reflect vascular changes due to cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:994-1005.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30318674
doi: 10.1002/jmri.26305
pmc: PMC6417969
mid: NIHMS993419
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
994-1005Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK113272
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : F32 DK008787
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK087877
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : F32 DK109591
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
J Hepatol. 2016 Dec;65(6):1131-1139
pubmed: 27475617
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Jan;41(1):42-9
pubmed: 26830610
World J Hepatol. 2018 Jan 27;10(1):73-81
pubmed: 29399280
Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):245-54
pubmed: 25325326
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Aug;32(2):466-75
pubmed: 20677279
Ultrasonography. 2016 Jan;35(1):3-12
pubmed: 26169079
Hepatology. 2004 Feb;39(2):280-2
pubmed: 14767976
Radiology. 1996 Feb;198(2):457-62
pubmed: 8596849
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;37(5):1100-8
pubmed: 23148034
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):5316-5324
pubmed: 28656461
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Sep;94(9):2467-74
pubmed: 10484010
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Oct;42(4):1009-17
pubmed: 25772828
Gut. 2011 Sep;60(9):1254-9
pubmed: 21504996
Radiology. 2012 Mar;262(3):862-73
pubmed: 22357888
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Mar;31(3):579-88
pubmed: 20187200
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jun;25(6):669-75
pubmed: 23411868
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jul;209(1):46-54
pubmed: 28463524
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):1981-90
pubmed: 26373753
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):440-451.e6
pubmed: 25305349
Hepatology. 1996 Aug;24(2):289-93
pubmed: 8690394
J Hepatol. 1997 Dec;27(6):986-92
pubmed: 9453423
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;34(4):266-271
pubmed: 29846263
Gastroenterology. 1990 Jun;98(6):1603-11
pubmed: 2186953
Radiology. 1993 Sep;188(3):643-8
pubmed: 8351326
Ann Med. 2014 Feb;46(1):8-17
pubmed: 24328372
Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):659-66
pubmed: 26744140
Liver Int. 2007 Oct;27(8):1103-10
pubmed: 17845539
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Oct;80(1):24-35
pubmed: 21333479
Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):144-55
pubmed: 21771955
Liver Int. 2010 Nov;30(10):1403-13
pubmed: 20731772
Clin Radiol. 2009 Nov;64(11):1056-66
pubmed: 19822238
Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):574-80
pubmed: 16864678
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Sep;34(3):577-84
pubmed: 21751287
Radiology. 2016 Nov;281(2):574-582
pubmed: 27171019
N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 24;353(21):2254-61
pubmed: 16306522
Radiology. 1997 Mar;202(3):721-4
pubmed: 9051024