Kidney transplantation in patients with previous renal cancer: a critical appraisal of current evidence and guidelines.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ diagnosis
Evidence-Based Medicine
Graft Survival
/ drug effects
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ adverse effects
Kidney Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Kidney Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prevalence
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
/ diagnosis
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Cancer risk
Kidney transplantation
Onconephrology
Renal cancer
Journal
Journal of nephrology
ISSN: 1724-6059
Titre abrégé: J Nephrol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9012268
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
14
06
2018
accepted:
29
09
2018
pubmed:
18
10
2018
medline:
6
5
2020
entrez:
18
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Due to the increasing occurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the general population and the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease among cancer patients, many people with a previous RCC may eventually require renal replacement therapy including kidney transplantation. They should accordingly be evaluated to assess their life expectancy and the risk that the chronic immunosuppressive therapy needed after grafting might impair their long-term outcome. Current guidelines on listing patients for renal transplantation suggest that no delay is required for subjects with small or incidentally discovered RCC, while the recommendations for patients who have been treated for a symptomatic RCC or for those with large or invasive tumours are conflicting. The controversial results reported by even recent studies focusing on the cancer risk in kidney graft recipients with a prior history of malignancy do not help to clarify the doubts arising in everyday clinical practice. Several tools, including integrated scoring systems, are currently available to assess the prognosis of patients with a previous RCC and, although they have not been validated in subjects receiving long-term immunosuppressive drugs, they can be used to identify patients suitable to be listed for grafting. Among these, the Leibovich score is currently the most widely used as it has proved simple and reliable enough and helps categorize renal transplant candidates. According to this system, subjects with a score from 0 to 2 are at low risk and may be listed without delay, while those with a score of 6 or higher should be excluded from grafting. In addition, other factors have an established positive prognostic value, including chromophobe or clear cell papillary tumour, or G1 grade cancer; on the contrary, medullary or Bellini's duct carcinoma or those with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation at histological examination should be excluded. All other patients would be better submitted to careful individual evaluation by an Oncologist before being listed for renal transplantation, pending studies specifically focusing on cancer risk evaluation in people already treated for malignancy receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30328092
doi: 10.1007/s40620-018-0542-y
pii: 10.1007/s40620-018-0542-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
57-64Références
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 68:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
doi: 10.3322/caac.21442
Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182:1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004
pubmed: 19683266
Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005
pubmed: 25616710
Psutka SP, Feldman AS, McDougal WS et al (2013) Long-term oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 63:486–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.062
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.062
pubmed: 22959191
Launay-Vacher V (2016) Renal dysfunction has statistically and clinically significant deleterious effects on anticancer drug safety. J Clin Oncol 34:2428–2428. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1554
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1554
pubmed: 27185847
Frascà GM, Sandrini S, Cosmai L et al (2015) Renal cancer in kidney transplanted patients. J Nephrol 28:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-015-0219-8
doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0219-8
pubmed: 26202137
Penn I (1997) Evaluation of transplant candidates with pre-existing malignancies. Ann Transpl 2:14–17
Campbell S, Pilmore H, Gracey D et al (2013) KHA-CARI guideline: recipient assessment for transplantation. Nephrology (Carlton) 18:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12068
doi: 10.1111/nep.12068
Kasiske BL, Cangro CB, Hariharan S et al (2001) The evaluation of renal transplantation candidates: clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transpl 1(Suppl 2):3–95
Bunnapradist S, Danovitch GM (2007) Evaluation of adult kidney transplant candidates. Am J Kidney Dis 50:890–898. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.08.010
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.08.010
pubmed: 17954303
European Best Practice Guidelines for Renal Transplantation (2000) Evaluation, selection and preparation of the potential transplant recipient. Work-up for cancer and waiting time for pre-existing cancer. Nephrol Dial Transpl 15(supp 7):6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027999
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027999
Karam G, Kälble T, Alcaraz A et al (2014) Guidelines on renal transplantation of the European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Renal_Transplant-2013.pdf . Accessed 8 May 2018
Knoll G, Cockfield S, Blydt-Hansen T et al (2005) Canadian Society of Transplantation consensus guidelines on eligibility for kidney transplantation. CMAJ 173:1181–1184. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051291
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051291
pubmed: 16275969
pmcid: 1277045
Webster AC, Craig JC, Simpson JM et al (2007) Identifying high risk groups and quantifying absolute risk of cancer after kidney transplantation: a cohort study of 15,183 recipients. Am J Transpl 7:2140–2151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01908.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01908.x
Kauffman HM, Cherikh WS, McBride MA et al (2005) Transplant recipients with a history of a malignancy: risk of recurrent and de novo cancers. Transpl Rev 19:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2005.02.002
doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2005.02.002
Viecelli AK, Lim WH, Macaskill P et al (2015) Cancer-specific and all-cause mortality in kidney transplant recipients with and without previous cancer. Transplantation 99:2586–2592. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000760
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000760
pubmed: 26102612
Brattström C, Granath F, Edgren G et al (2013) Overall and cause-specific mortality in transplant recipients with a pretransplantation cancer history. Transplantation 96:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e31829854b7
doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31829854b7
pubmed: 23759880
Farrugia D, Mahboob S, Cheshire J et al (2014) Malignancy-related mortality following kidney transplantation is common. Kidney Int 85:1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.458
doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.458
pubmed: 24257690
Kiberd BA, Rose C, Gill JS (2009) Cancer mortality in kidney transplantation. Am J Transpl 9:1868–1875. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02728.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02728.x
Dahle DO, Grotmol T, Leivestad T et al (2017) Association between pretransplant cancer and survival in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 101:2599–2605. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001659
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001659
pubmed: 28207636
Nguyen KA, Syed JS, Luciano R et al (2017) Optimizing waiting duration for renal transplants in the setting of renal malignancy: is 2 years too long to wait? Nephrol Dial Transpl 32:1767–1773. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx254
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx254
Greene FL, Sobin LH (2009) A worldwide approach to the TNM staging system: collaborative efforts of the AJCC and UICC. J Surg Oncol 99:269–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21237
doi: 10.1002/jso.21237
pubmed: 19170124
Novara G, Ficarra V, Antonelli A et al (2011) Corrigendum to “Validation of the 2009 TNM version in a large multi-institutional cohort of patients treated for renal cell carcinoma: are further improvements needed?”. Eur Urol 59:182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.017 (Eur Urol 58:588–595)
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.017
pubmed: 27989306
Klatte T, Chung J, Leppert JT et al (2007) Prognostic relevance of capsular involvement and collecting system invasion in stage I and II renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 99:821–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06729.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06729.x
pubmed: 17244281
Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H et al (2003) Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27:612–624
doi: 10.1097/00000478-200305000-00005
pubmed: 12717246
Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Galfano A et al (2006) Prognostic role of the histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma after slide revision. Eur Urol 50:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.009
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.009
pubmed: 16697521
Gupta R, Billis A, Shah RB et al (2012) Carcinoma of the collecting ducts of bellini and renal medullary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1265–1278. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182635954
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182635954
pubmed: 22895263
Delahunt B, Cheville JC, Martignoni G et al (2013) The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1490–1504. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f0fb
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f0fb
pubmed: 24025520
Jones TD, Eble JN, Wang M et al (2005) Clonal divergence and genetic heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinomas with sarcomatoid transformation. Cancer 104:1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21288
doi: 10.1002/cncr.21288
pubmed: 16047350
Delahunt B (1999) Sarcomatoid renal carcinoma: the final common dedifferentiation pathway of renal epithelial malignancies. Pathology 31:185–190
doi: 10.1080/003130299104945
pubmed: 10503259
Lohse CM, Cheville JC (2005) A review of prognostic pathologic features and algorithms for patients treated surgically for renal cell carcinoma. Clin Lab Med 25:433–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2005.01.013
doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2005.01.013
pubmed: 15848745
Galfano A, Novara G, Iafrate M et al (2008) Mathematical models for prognostic prediction in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Int 80:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1159/000112599
doi: 10.1159/000112599
pubmed: 18362478
Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS (2001) Validation of the UCLA integrated staging system for patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 19:3792–3793. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.17.3792
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.17.3792
pubmed: 11533107
Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al (2003) Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 97:1663–1671. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11234
doi: 10.1002/cncr.11234
pubmed: 12655523
Leibovich BC, Han K, Bui MHT et al (2003) Scoring algorithm to predict survival after nephrectomy and immunotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 98:2566–2575. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11851
doi: 10.1002/cncr.11851
pubmed: 14669275
Klatte T, Said JW, Seligson DB et al (2011) Pathological, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic features of papillary renal cell carcinoma with clear cell features. J Urol 185:30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.013
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.013
pubmed: 21074210