Improvement in ejection fraction after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in individuals with systolic dysfunction.
Ablation
Atrial fibrillation
Cryoballoon
Pulmonary vein isolation
Systolic dysfunction
Journal
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing
ISSN: 1572-8595
Titre abrégé: J Interv Card Electrophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9708966
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
accepted:
11
10
2018
pubmed:
18
10
2018
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
18
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is commonly used for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). Data are limited examining the outcomes of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction. We evaluate the impact of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction. We evaluated a single-center prospective registry of patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI between 8/2011 and 6/2016. Patients with systolic dysfunction (EF < 55%) between the time of AF diagnosis and their cryoballoon PVI procedure were assessed for AF recurrence at 6 months and 1 year post-procedure, with a 3-month blanking period. Final analysis included 66 patients with systolic dysfunction undergoing cryoballoon PVI. An AF diagnosis for ≥ 1 year prior to PVI was present in 62.1% (n = 41), and 53.0% (n = 35) had systolic dysfunction for ≥ 1 year pre-procedure. The proportion of AF-free patients at 1 year was 51.5%. Of patients with echocardiograms performed at 1 year (n = 43), a greater proportion of individuals without AF recurrence had an improvement in EF of ≥ 10% than in those with AF recurrence (54.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.039). Of the patients who had systolic dysfunction at the time of the ablation (EF < 55%), there was a significant increase in EF post-procedure (36.5% pre-procedure vs. 48.3% post-procedure, mean change 11.8%, p < 0.001). In patients with systolic dysfunction, cryoballoon PVI provides an acceptable AF recurrence-free rate at 1 year. AF recurrence-free individuals were more likely to have improvement in EF. Further evaluation is needed to determine the potential role of early cryoballoon PVI in patients with a new diagnosis of systolic dysfunction and AF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is commonly used for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). Data are limited examining the outcomes of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction. We evaluate the impact of cryoballoon PVI in patients with systolic dysfunction.
METHODS
METHODS
We evaluated a single-center prospective registry of patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI between 8/2011 and 6/2016. Patients with systolic dysfunction (EF < 55%) between the time of AF diagnosis and their cryoballoon PVI procedure were assessed for AF recurrence at 6 months and 1 year post-procedure, with a 3-month blanking period.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Final analysis included 66 patients with systolic dysfunction undergoing cryoballoon PVI. An AF diagnosis for ≥ 1 year prior to PVI was present in 62.1% (n = 41), and 53.0% (n = 35) had systolic dysfunction for ≥ 1 year pre-procedure. The proportion of AF-free patients at 1 year was 51.5%. Of patients with echocardiograms performed at 1 year (n = 43), a greater proportion of individuals without AF recurrence had an improvement in EF of ≥ 10% than in those with AF recurrence (54.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.039). Of the patients who had systolic dysfunction at the time of the ablation (EF < 55%), there was a significant increase in EF post-procedure (36.5% pre-procedure vs. 48.3% post-procedure, mean change 11.8%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with systolic dysfunction, cryoballoon PVI provides an acceptable AF recurrence-free rate at 1 year. AF recurrence-free individuals were more likely to have improvement in EF. Further evaluation is needed to determine the potential role of early cryoballoon PVI in patients with a new diagnosis of systolic dysfunction and AF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30328546
doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0475-3
pii: 10.1007/s10840-018-0475-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
225-229Références
Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2920-5
pubmed: 12771006
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 15;46(10):1902-12
pubmed: 16286179
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Jun;5(6):802-6
pubmed: 18534363
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jul 22;52(4):273-8
pubmed: 18634982
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1778-85
pubmed: 18946063
Circulation. 2009 May 12;119(18):2516-25
pubmed: 19433768
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;7(1):31-8
pubmed: 24382410
Circulation. 2016 Apr 26;133(17):1637-44
pubmed: 27029350
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45
pubmed: 27042964
J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Feb 28;7(5):1191
pubmed: 27957151
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 27;6(8):null
pubmed: 28751544
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Mar;15(3):363-368
pubmed: 29107190
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 01;378(5):417-427
pubmed: 29385358
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Mar 1;57(8):563-70
pubmed: 3953440
Br Heart J. 1985 Mar;53(3):323-7
pubmed: 3970789
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Sep;32(3):695-703
pubmed: 9741514