Applicability of the real ear measurement for audiological intervention of tinnitus.
Aconselhamento
Aparelhos de amplificação sonora individual
Counseling
Hearing AIDS
Hearing loss
Perda de audição
Tinnitus
Zumbido
Journal
Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
ISSN: 1808-8686
Titre abrégé: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101207337
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
17
02
2018
revised:
17
05
2018
accepted:
30
07
2018
pubmed:
20
10
2018
medline:
16
4
2020
entrez:
20
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tinnitus is present in a large part of chronic health complaints, and it is considered a public health problem injurious to the individual's quality of life. Considering the increase of the world population associated with an increase of life expectancy, tinnitus remains a cause for medical concern, since during aging the occurrence of auditory impairments due to the deterioration of the peripheral auditory structures and central impairs the quality of life. The aim of the present study was to analyze the applicability of real ear measurements for audiological intervention of tinnitus through specific evaluation, selection, verification and validation of the hearing aids combined with the sound generator. Forty individuals of both genders with hearing loss and tinnitus complaints were deemed eligible to compose the sample. They were enrolled according to clinical symptoms and submitted to the following procedures: anamnesis and previous complaint history, high frequency audiometry, immittanciometry and acuphenometry with the research of psychoacoustic thresholds of pitch, loudness and minimum masking threshold, sound generator, in addition to the application of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Visual Analog Scale tools. The entire sample was adapted with Siemens hearing aids and a sound generator, participated in a counseling session with support of digital material and evaluated in two situations: Initial Assessment (before the hearing aids and sound generator adaptation) and Final Assessment (6 months, after adaptation). The statistical analyzes were descriptive and inferential, adopted a significance level of 5% and the T-Paired Test and the Spearman Correlation test were performed. The results showed that there was a benefit with the use of hearing aids combined with a sound generator from the statistically significant values and strong correlations between the sound generator verification data regarding acuphenometry and the nuisance/severity questionnaires. Regarding the verification of the sound generator, it is important to highlight that the entire sample selected the effective acoustic stimulation based on the comfort levels, which was proved in the present study to be a sufficient intensity for positive prognosis, whereas the users' noises were found below the psychoacoustic thresholds of acuphenometry. The present study concluded that the audiological intervention with any level of sound stimulus is enough to obtain a positive prognosis in the medium term. Data that specifies that the verification of sound generator was effective at the real ear measurements are important in the evaluation and intervention of the complaint. In addition, it points out that the greater the tinnitus perception, the greater its severity, and the greater the nuisance, the higher the psychoacoustics thresholds of frequency and the minimum threshold of masking.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30337103
pii: S1808-8694(18)30574-3
doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.07.010
pmc: PMC9422393
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14-22Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Références
Pro Fono. 2005 Apr-Dec;17(3):303-10
pubmed: 16389787
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar-Apr;81(2):167-76
pubmed: 25631578
J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 19;25(3):699-705
pubmed: 15659607
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr;35(5):1089-109
pubmed: 21094182
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Jan;25(1):62-75
pubmed: 24622861
Int J Audiol. 2012 Dec;51(12):914-9
pubmed: 23126317
J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10;30(45):14972-9
pubmed: 21068300
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1599
pubmed: 28970812
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Jan-Feb;76(1):18-24
pubmed: 20339684
Int J Audiol. 2018 Feb;57(2):143-149
pubmed: 29022411
Diagn Pathol. 2013 Dec 19;8:209
pubmed: 24354736
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517736689
pubmed: 29076393
Codas. 2013;25(2):176-80
pubmed: 24408248
Front Neurol. 2014 Oct 06;5:196
pubmed: 25339938
Am J Med. 2010 Aug;123(8):711-8
pubmed: 20670725
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 May - Jun;83(3):249-255
pubmed: 27923565
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):126-38
pubmed: 22353681
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May-Jun;82(3):297-303
pubmed: 26541232
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jul-Aug;21(7):461-73
pubmed: 20807482
Int J Audiol. 2011 Aug;50(8):548-53
pubmed: 21595527
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Sep;12(9):920-930
pubmed: 23948178
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):126-132
pubmed: 27560491
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Aug;73(2):112-21
pubmed: 22789414
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010 Dec;37(6):685-93
pubmed: 20430549
Hear Res. 2009 Aug;254(1-2):82-91
pubmed: 19409969