Modeling of Contaminant Biodegradation and Compound-Specific Isotope Fractionation in Chemostats at Low Dilution Rates.
Journal
Environmental science & technology
ISSN: 1520-5851
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0213155
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 02 2019
05 02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
20
10
2018
medline:
19
9
2019
entrez:
20
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present a framework to model microbial transformations in chemostats and retentostats under transient or quasi-steady state conditions. The model accounts for transformation-induced isotope fractionation and mass-transfer across the cell membrane. It also verifies that the isotope fractionation ϵ can be evaluated as the difference of substrate-specific isotope ratios between inflow and outflow. We explicitly considered that the dropwise feeding of substrate into the reactor at very low dilution rates leads to transient behavior of concentrations and transformation rates and use this information to validate conditions under which a quasi-steady state treatment is justified. We demonstrate the practicality of the code by modeling a chemostat experiment of atrazine degradation at low dilution/growth rates by the strain Arthrobacter aurescens TC1. Our results shed light on the interplay of processes that control biodegradation and isotope fractionation of contaminants at low (μg/L) concentration levels. With the help of the model, an estimate of the mass-transfer coefficient of atrazine through the cell membrane was achieved (0.0025 s
Identifiants
pubmed: 30339002
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02498
pmc: PMC6986770
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Isotopes
0
Isotopes
0
Atrazine
QJA9M5H4IM
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1186-1196Références
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 May 5;49(9):5529-37
pubmed: 25839352
Dalton Trans. 2014 Aug 28;43(32):12175-86
pubmed: 24851834
Arch Microbiol. 1984 Feb;137(2):176-84
pubmed: 6202266
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Jan 29;854(2):191-7
pubmed: 3942724
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;43(21):8079-85
pubmed: 19924926
Water Res. 2010 Sep;44(17):4826-37
pubmed: 20688348
Mutat Res. 2004 Nov;567(2-3):109-49
pubmed: 15572284
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Apr 15;45(8):3374-85
pubmed: 21428281
Biomacromolecules. 2010 Jun 14;11(6):1488-93
pubmed: 20459087
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Sep 1;42(17):6544-51
pubmed: 18800528
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Apr 15;45(8):3605-12
pubmed: 21428279
Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Dec;107 Suppl 6:907-38
pubmed: 10592150
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Jun;62(6):400-5
pubmed: 15901888
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Jan 12;1416(1-2):333-8
pubmed: 9889392
Environ Model Softw. 2017 Dec;98:12-20
pubmed: 29200932
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Feb;9(2):112-24
pubmed: 18216768
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 5;53(3):1197-1205
pubmed: 30514083
Arch Microbiol. 1982 Dec 3;133(4):300-2
pubmed: 7171288
J Bacteriol. 2012 May;194(9):2165-80
pubmed: 22366417
Science. 2006 Aug 25;313(5790):1072-7
pubmed: 16931750
J Cell Comp Physiol. 1955 Aug;46(1):1-27
pubmed: 13263366
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 17;49(6):3490-8
pubmed: 25688667
Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Mar 1;40(5):1588-96
pubmed: 16568774
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Apr 3;52(7):4137-4144
pubmed: 29495658
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Dec 1;43(23):8813-20
pubmed: 19943651
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Sep 1;42(17):6552-8
pubmed: 18800529
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Aug 15;39(16):6052-62
pubmed: 16173563
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 15;44(16):6167-73
pubmed: 20704214