Assessment of the ecotoxicity of phytotreatment substrate soil as landfill cover material for in-situ leachate management.

Closed landfills Ecotoxicological bioassays Environmental legislation Landfill leachate phytotreatment Substrate soil chemical characterization

Journal

Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 13 04 2018
revised: 06 09 2018
accepted: 06 10 2018
pubmed: 24 10 2018
medline: 26 9 2019
entrez: 24 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Phytotreatment capping in closed landfills is a promising, cost-effective, in situ option for sustainable leachate treatment and might be synergistically coupled with energy crops to produce renewable energy (e.g.: biodiesel or bioethanol). This study proposes to use 0.30 m of soil as growing substrate for plants cultivated on the temporary cover of closed landfills. Once the leachate phytotreatment process is no longer required, 0.70 m of the same soil would be added to attain the final top cover configuration. This solution would entail saving the costs of excavation and backfilling. However, worsening of the initial soil quality due to potential contaminant transfer from the liquid to the solid matrix must be avoided because EU legislation (such as that in Italy) fixes concentration limits for contaminants in soil. In this research, samples of soil used as substrate in a lab-scale leachate phytotreatment test with sunflowers were analysed to provide chemical characterization before, during, and at the end of the experiment. The results showed that the phytotreatment activity did not increase initial contaminant concentrations. These results are reinforced by those from ecotoxicological bioassays in which Eisenia fetida (earthworms), Lepidium sativum (cress), Folsomia candida (collembola), and Caenorhabditis elegans and Steinernema carpocapsae (nematodes) were used. It was observed that, by the end of the experiment, the substrate soil did not affect the earthworms, collembola and nematode behaviour, or the growth of cress.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30352366
pii: S0301-4797(18)31142-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.014
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Soil 0
Soil Pollutants 0
Water Pollutants, Chemical 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

289-296

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Francesco Garbo (F)

DII - Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131, Padova, Italy.

Alberto Pivato (A)

DICEA - Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: alberto.pivato@unipd.it.

Barbara Manachini (B)

SAAF - Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 13, 90128, Palermo, Italy.

Carlo Giovanni Moretto (CG)

ARPAV - Inlad Water Observatory, via Rezzonico 41, 35131, Padova, Italy.

Maria Cristina Lavagnolo (MC)

DICEA - Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131, Padova, Italy.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Genome, Bacterial Virulence Phylogeny Genomics Plant Diseases
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Cameroon Humans Uranium Trace Elements Environmental Monitoring

Classifications MeSH